Resolution to End Unauthorized Military Involvement in Venezuela
October 16, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Finance Connection
| Candidate | Donor | Amount | Industry | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul da Silva for Marin College Board 2020 | United Professors of Marin Political Action Committee | $25,000 | - | Jul 2020 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $12,500 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Oct 2025 |
| Paula A. Stark | STARK PAULA | $10,000 | STATE REPRESENTATIVE | Aug 2025 |
| Gary Paul Flower | Gary P. Flower | $10,000 | Judge | Nov 2025 |
| Friends Of Paul Krekorian | Peyman Bolandhemat | $8,306 | Restauranteur | Jan 2000 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $7,056 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Jan 2026 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $7,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Feb 2026 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $7,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $7,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Dec 2025 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $7,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Jan 2026 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $6,445 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $6,408 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Sep 2025 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $6,116 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Dec 2025 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $6,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Oct 2025 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $5,142 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Schiff for State Senate | CA Real Estate PAC CREPAC | $5,000 | - | Jan 2000 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $5,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Oct 2025 |
| Paul Renner | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $5,000 | PARTY COMMITTEE | Nov 2025 |
| FRIENDS OF PAUL KORETZ | United Teachers Los Angeles PACE | $5,000 | - | Jan 2000 |
| Louis Paul Henyecz | Loius Henyecz | $5,000 | Loan to Campaign Acct | Mar 2025 |
Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.
The Frame
This resolution seeks to limit the President's ability to engage in military conflict in Venezuela without a formal declaration of war or specific statutory authorization from Congress.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
President of the United States
The President is directed to terminate military hostilities in Venezuela unless specific congressional authorization is granted.
United States Armed Forces
The deployment and operational status of military personnel in or near Venezuela are subject to the termination directive.
Last recorded activity October 16, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
- The resolution directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces for hostilities in or against Venezuela.
- The mandate applies unless Congress passes a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force.
- The resolution includes a 'rule of construction' allowing the U.S. to defend itself from an armed attack or imminent threat.
- Congress asserts it has not declared war on Venezuela or authorized military force there.
- The resolution cites reports of CIA authorization for covert lethal operations in Venezuela as evidence of imminent hostilities.
- The resolution cites the buildup of U.S. military assets and personnel near Venezuela as evidence of imminent hostilities.
- The resolution cites official government statements regarding planning for ground strikes as evidence of imminent hostilities.
- The resolution invokes expedited procedures under the International Security and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 for consideration.
Why It Matters
This resolution seeks to limit the President's ability to engage in military conflict in Venezuela without a formal declaration of war or specific statutory authorization from Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill prevent the U.S. from defending itself?
What happens if this resolution passes?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
100
Yes
49
No
51
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (100)
Todd Young
R · no
Jeff Merkley
D · yes
Shelley Capito
R · no
Rick Scott
R · no
Bill Cassidy
R · no
Jacky Rosen
D · yes
Martin Heinrich
D · yes
John Kennedy
R · no
Marsha Blackburn
R · no
Andy Kim
D · yes
John Fetterman
D · yes
Maggie Hassan
D · yes
Mitch McConnell
R · no
Eric Schmitt
R · no
Mike Rounds
R · no
John Reed
D · yes
Susan Collins
R · no
Mazie Hirono
D · yes
Cindy Hyde-Smith
R · no
Bernie Sanders
I · yes
Steve Daines
R · no
John Hickenlooper
D · yes
Mark Kelly
D · yes
Rand Paul
R · yes
+ 76 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools