New Rules for Temporary Medical Licenses in Critical Need Areas
December 17, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Ordered enrolled. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Procedural history
19 actions- Feb 26, 2026HouseBill added to Special Order Calendar (3/3/2026)
- Feb 18, 2026HouseAdded to Second Reading Calendar
- Feb 18, 2026HouseBill released to House Calendar
- Feb 18, 2026HouseReported out of Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 18, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable by Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 16, 2026HouseAdded to Health & Human Services Committee agenda
Show 13 earlier actions
- Feb 6, 2026HouseNow in Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 6, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services Committee
- Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
- Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Feb 4, 2026HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
- Feb 4, 2026HouseReported out of Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Feb 3, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Jan 30, 2026HousePCS added to Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee agenda
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 5, 2026HouseNow in Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Jan 5, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services Committee
- Jan 5, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee
- Dec 17, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This change ensures that patients in medically underserved areas do not lose access to their current primary care providers if the state reclassifies their community as no longer having a 'critical need.'
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Temporary certificate holders (doctors, osteopaths, nurses)
They are subject to new annual review requirements and gain the ability to continue practicing in areas that lose their critical need designation.
Patients in areas of critical need
They may retain access to their current primary care providers even if their area's official designation changes.
Current stage: Ordered enrolled.
Signed.
Summary
Why It Matters
This change ensures that patients in medically underserved areas do not lose access to their current primary care providers if the state reclassifies their community as no longer having a 'critical need.'
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will I lose my doctor if my town is no longer considered an area of 'critical need'?
How often are these temporary medical professionals reviewed?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (Health & Human Services Committee)
Total
36
Yes
33
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (36)
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · absent
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Mitch Rosenwald
Democratic · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · absent
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · absent
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
+ 12 more
Favorable (Health Professions & Programs Subcommittee)
Total
30
Yes
26
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
4
Abstain
0
How they voted (30)
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · absent
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · absent
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Mitch Rosenwald
Democratic · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · absent
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · absent
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
+ 6 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift from Designation-Dependent Practice
The bill moves from a model where practice rights are strictly tied to a state-level designation to one that prioritizes existing patient-provider relationships.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools