POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8365FEDERALin_committee

Proposed Updates to the Sean and David Goldman International Child Abduction Prevention and Return Act

Original title: Sean and David Goldman Act Amendments

May 4, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.May 10, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill changes how the U.S. government tracks and supports children abducted internationally by extending consular outreach until age 18 and authorizing $2 million in federal spending for research on the issue.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Left-behind parents

The bill expands the definition of abduction cases to include those seeking rights of access or return, potentially broadening the scope of government assistance.

U.S. Consular Officers

Officers are tasked with new annual outreach requirements for abducted children who reach age 16.

Department of State

The agency is required to commission a study and manage the associated funding.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes updates to the 2014 law governing international parental child abduction, including expanding the definition of abduction cases and requiring consular officers to maintain contact with abducted children who reach age 16. It also mandates a new study on the impacts of international child abduction, with $1 million authorized for each of fiscal years 2025 and 2026.

Key Facts

  • Expands the definition of 'abduction case' to include applications filed by parents seeking rights of access or return.
  • Updates the definition of 'appropriate congressional committees' to include the House and Senate Committees on Homeland Security.
  • Increases the age threshold for certain abduction case definitions from 16 to 18.
  • Requires consular officers to annually contact abducted children who reach age 16 until they turn 18 or request the contact to cease.
  • Consular officers must advise children aged 16-18 of their rights regarding passport applications and specific benefits under Title 38 of the U.S. Code.
  • Mandates the Secretary of State to commission a study on the harm caused by international parental child abduction within one year of enactment.
  • Authorizes $1,000,000 in funding for the study for each of fiscal years 2025 and 2026.

Why It Matters

The bill changes how the U.S. government tracks and supports children abducted internationally by extending consular outreach until age 18 and authorizing $2 million in federal spending for research on the issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes for children who have been abducted?
Once they turn 16, U.S. consular officers are required to attempt to contact them annually to provide information about their rights, including passport applications, until they turn 18.
How much money is being spent on this?
The bill authorizes $1 million per year for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 to fund a study on the impacts of international parental child abduction.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Extension of Consular Outreach

The bill shifts the focus of consular involvement from strictly return-based efforts to include ongoing rights-based outreach for children aged 16-18.

Connected Entities

personMr. Smith of New JerseyThe Representative who introduced the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record