POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8492FEDERALin_committee

Prohibit Wildlife Killing Contests Act of 2024

April 23, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry.Sep 3, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would prohibit organized competitions involving the killing of wildlife for prizes on federal public lands, affecting event organizers, participants, and wildlife management practices across the United States.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Wildlife killing contest organizers

They would be prohibited from holding prize-based killing events on federal public lands.

Public land management agencies

They are required to draft and implement new regulations to enforce the ban within one year.

State and federal wildlife agencies

They retain the authority to conduct lethal control actions on species classified as invasive.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes a federal ban on organized wildlife killing contests held on public lands managed by agencies like the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management. It defines these contests as events where participants kill animals for prizes or cash, though it includes specific exceptions for certain types of hunting and official government wildlife control.

Key Facts

  • The bill makes it unlawful to organize, sponsor, conduct, or participate in a wildlife killing contest on federal public land.
  • A 'wildlife killing contest' is defined as an event where participants kill wildlife for cash, prizes, or other inducements.
  • Public land is defined as land owned by the U.S. and managed by the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, or U.S. Forest Service.
  • Exceptions are provided for field trials, contests targeting only ungulates (hoofed mammals) or specific birds (Galliformes/Anatidae), and official lethal control of invasive species.
  • Public land management agencies must issue necessary regulations within one year of the bill's enactment.
  • The bill does not preempt or limit state or local laws that are more restrictive than these federal requirements.
  • Wildlife is defined as all animal life except for fish, shellfish, and crustaceans.
  • The bill cites that 10 states (including California, Colorado, and New York) have already implemented bans on certain wildlife killing contests.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill ban all hunting on public land?
No. The bill specifically targets 'wildlife killing contests' where participants compete for prizes or cash. It explicitly excludes and contests targeting specific game animals like or certain birds.
What happens if a state already has a stricter law?
The bill states that it does not preempt or limit any state or local law that is more restrictive than the federal requirements.
Who is responsible for enforcing this?
The heads of the relevant public land management agencies (such as the BLM or Forest Service) are required to issue regulations to carry out the prohibition within one year of the bill becoming law.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would prohibit organized competitions involving the killing of wildlife for prizes on federal public lands, affecting event organizers, participants, and wildlife management practices across the United States.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federalization of Wildlife Contest Bans

The bill explicitly references the existing bans in 10 states as a justification for establishing a uniform federal standard on public lands.

Connected Entities

personSteve CohenPrimary sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.Map →
organizationBureau of Land ManagementA public land management agency tasked with implementing regulations under this Map →
organizationUnited States Fish and Wildlife ServiceA public land management agency tasked with implementing regulations under this Map →
organizationUnited States Forest ServiceA public land management agency tasked with implementing regulations under this Map →
organizationNational Park ServiceA public land management agency tasked with implementing regulations under this Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record