POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofArtificial Intelligence →
S3312FEDERALUNKNOWN
High Impact

Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act of 2023

Original title: Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act of 2024

December 18, 2024

Artificial IntelligenceTechnology RegulationGovernment AccountabilityConsumer ProtectionData Privacy

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would impose new compliance and reporting requirements on companies developing or deploying AI systems that affect critical areas like housing, credit, and criminal justice, with potential civil penalties of up to $300,000 per violation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

AI Developers and Deployers

Must comply with new transparency reporting, risk assessment, and certification requirements.

Federal Agencies

Required to respond to NIST recommendations regarding AI oversight and undergo studies on AI adoption.

Consumers

Entitled to clear notice when interacting with generative AI content on covered platforms.

What changed

Last recorded activity December 18, 2024.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill establishes a federal framework for regulating artificial intelligence (AI) systems, requiring transparency for generative AI, safety reporting for high-impact systems, and certification standards for critical-impact systems. It mandates that the Department of Commerce oversee these standards and creates new oversight mechanisms for federal agency AI adoption.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to all AI systems?
No, it focuses on 'high-impact' and 'critical-impact' AI systems, specifically those that make significant decisions regarding housing, employment, credit, education, healthcare, or insurance, or those that pose significant risks to constitutional rights or safety.
What happens if a company violates these rules?
The Secretary of Commerce can order remedial action and impose civil penalties of up to $300,000 per violation. Intentional violations may result in a prohibition on deploying critical-impact AI systems.
Are small businesses exempt?
Yes, platforms that are small (under 500 employees, under $50M in annual revenue, and processing data for fewer than 1 million individuals) are excluded from the '' requirements.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would impose new compliance and reporting requirements on companies developing or deploying AI systems that affect critical areas like housing, credit, and criminal justice, with potential civil penalties of up to $300,000 per violation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift toward sector-specific AI oversight

The bill moves away from a single, monolithic AI regulator, instead empowering the Department of Commerce to develop sector-specific recommendations for existing federal agencies.

Department of CommerceNational Institute of Standards and Technology

Connected Entities

personHickenlooper, Michael“Co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
personThune, John“Lead sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
personCapito, Shelley“Co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
organizationComptroller General“Tasked with a study on barriers and best practices for AI usage in government”Map →
personKlobuchar, Amy“Co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
organizationOffice of Management and Budget“Oversees recommendations for risk management of AI systems”Map →
personWicker, Roger“Co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
personLujan, Ben“Co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate”Map →
organizationUnder Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology“Responsible for conducting research on content authenticity and provenance stand”Map →
organizationNational Institute of Standards and Technology“The research is conducted as part of the NIST Act”Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance90
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record