POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SPB 2506FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026in_committee

Proposed Changes to Florida Fuel Tax Revenue Distribution

Original title: Fuel Taxes

February 17, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/20/26 --If ReceivedFeb 17, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill changes the specific funding streams for state environmental programs, including aquatic plant management, boating infrastructure, and agricultural emergency response, which affects how state agencies prioritize these services starting July 1, 2026.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

The agency receives specific percentage-based allocations of fuel tax revenue for conservation and boating programs.

Local governments in counties with populations of 100,000 or less

These jurisdictions receive priority consideration for funding for public boat ramps and waterway markers.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill updates how revenue from state fuel taxes is distributed among various environmental and transportation trust funds. It modifies the percentage-based allocations for programs managed by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and adjusts the handling of funds collected for coastal and water quality protection.

Key Facts

  • The bill takes effect on July 1, 2026.
  • Administrative costs for collecting and distributing fuel taxes are capped at 2 percent of total collections.
  • 0.5 percent of fuel tax collections are allocated to the Invasive Plant Control Trust Fund for aquatic plant management.
  • At least $1 million of the Invasive Plant Control Trust Fund allocation must be used for the eradication of melaleuca.
  • 0.2 percent of fuel tax collections are allocated to the State Game Trust Fund for recreational boating and fisheries management.
  • Within the State Game Trust Fund allocation, a minimum of $1.25 million is reserved for local boating projects like ramps and channel markers, with priority for counties with populations of 100,000 or less.
  • The allocation for the Agricultural Emergency Eradication Trust Fund is set at 0.65 percent of fuel tax collections.
  • Fuel tax revenue from marina sales is directed to the Marine Resources Conservation Trust Fund.
  • The first $150 million of specific fuel tax collections (under s. 206.9935(3)) is directed to the Inland Protection Trust Fund, with the remainder going to the General Revenue Fund.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does this bill affect my fuel taxes?
The bill does not change the amount of tax paid by consumers; it changes how the state distributes the money after it is collected.
What happens to the money collected from fuel sales at marinas?
Revenue attributable to fuel sales at marinas is transferred to the Marine Resources Conservation Trust Fund.
Who manages the boating improvement projects funded by this bill?
The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission manages these funds and is required to report on project status via their website.

Why It Matters

The bill changes the specific funding streams for state environmental programs, including aquatic plant management, boating infrastructure, and agricultural emergency response, which affects how state agencies prioritize these services starting July 1, 2026.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

A STREET STRATEGIES

on behalf of National Association of Convenience Stores

2026

FUEL/GAS/OILBANKINGTOBACCOTAXATION/INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

Issues relating to renewable fuels and energy policy Issues relating to UST regulations Issues relating to renewable fuels standard implementation Issues relating to retailer liability associated with selling alternative and renewable fuels Issues relating to the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax Issues relating to Biodiesel Blenders' Tax Credit Issues relating to the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property tax credit Issues relating to Gas prices and fuel markets, price gouging E15 RVP waiver

ADVANCED POLICY CONSULTING, LLC

on behalf of AMERICAN CEMENT ASSOCIATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION)

LARRAGAN CREST STRATEGIES

on behalf of MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA

POTOMAC STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC

on behalf of THE PASHA GROUP

POTOMAC STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC

on behalf of THE PASHA GROUP

POTOMAC STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC

on behalf of THE PASHA GROUP

RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP LLC

on behalf of EATON CORPORATION

COVENANT GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

on behalf of PLUG POWER, INC.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift from Fixed Dollar Amounts to Percentages

The bill replaces several fixed dollar amount transfers with percentage-based allocations, likely to allow funding to scale automatically with fuel tax revenue fluctuations.

Connected Entities

otherInvasive Plant Control Trust FundFund receiving 0.5% of fuel tax collections for aquatic weed management.Map →
organizationFish and Wildlife Conservation CommissionRecipient of fuel tax funds for conservation and boating programs.Map →
otherAgricultural Emergency Eradication Trust FundFund receiving 0.65% of fuel tax collections.Map →
organizationFlorida LegislatureThe legislative body proposing the bill.Map →
otherState Game Trust FundFund receiving 0.2% of fuel tax collections for boating and fisheries.Map →
otherFuel Tax Collection Trust FundThe primary fund where fuel tax collections are deposited before distribution.Map →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record