Proposed Tax Credits for Employer Homebuyer Contributions
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have provided up to $5 million annually in tax credits to employers, potentially lowering the cost of homeownership for eligible employees, but the legislation died in the House during the 2026 session.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Moderate-income employees
They would have been eligible to receive employer contributions toward home purchase expenses.
Employers
They would have been eligible to claim tax credits against corporate income or insurance premium taxes for contributions made to employees.
Department of Revenue
They would have been required to process applications, approve credits, and adopt rules for the program.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who would have qualified as an 'eligible employee'?
Could an employer sell or transfer these tax credits?
What would have happened if the tax credit was not fully used in one year?
Why It Matters
The bill would have provided up to $5 million annually in tax credits to employers, potentially lowering the cost of homeownership for eligible employees, but the legislation died in the House during the 2026 session.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable (Commerce Committee)
Total
26
Yes
22
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
4
Abstain
0
How they voted (26)
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · not voting
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · not voting
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · not voting
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Carlos Smith
Democratic · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
David Borrero
Republican · yes
Wyman Duggan
Republican · not voting
+ 2 more
Favorable (Ways & Means Committee)
Total
18
Yes
18
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (18)
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Bill Partington
Republican · yes
Tom Fabricio
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Webster Barnaby
Republican · yes
Kelly Skidmore
Democratic · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Wyman Duggan
Republican · yes
Chad Johnson
Republican · yes
Carlos Smith
Democratic · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Monique Miller
Republican · yes
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative Sunset Clause
The bill included a mandatory repeal date of January 1, 2030, requiring future legislative action to continue the program.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools