POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 344FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026dead

Proposed Restrictions on AI in Mental Health Services

Original title: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychological, Clinical, Counseling, and Therapy Services

March 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The bill would have established legal boundaries for the use of AI in sensitive clinical settings, directly impacting how psychologists, social workers, and counselors manage patient data and therapeutic interactions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Psychologists and school psychologists

The bill would have restricted their ability to use AI in clinical practice and set requirements for administrative AI use.

Clinical social workers, marriage and family therapists, and mental health counselors

The bill would have prohibited their use of AI in clinical practice and mandated consent procedures for AI-assisted session recording.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill would have prohibited mental health professionals from using in clinical practice, while allowing its use for administrative tasks like billing and scheduling. It also would have required written patient consent at least 24 hours in advance for any AI-assisted recording or transcription of therapy sessions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Would this bill have banned all technology in therapy?
No. It would have specifically restricted the use of '' in clinical practice, while explicitly allowing its use for administrative support like scheduling, billing, and record-keeping.
Could a therapist still use AI to transcribe my session?
Under the proposed bill, a therapist could use AI for transcription only if they obtained your written, informed consent at least 24 hours before the session.

Why It Matters

The bill would have established legal boundaries for the use of AI in sensitive clinical settings, directly impacting how psychologists, social workers, and counselors manage patient data and therapeutic interactions.

News Coverage

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Legislative attempt to regulate AI in clinical settings

The bill represents an effort to codify the definition of AI and restrict its application in mental health before widespread clinical adoption.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record