POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on U.S. Maritime and Shipbuilding Industry Strategy

Original title: U.S. MARITIME AND SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRIES: STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE REGULATION, ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, AND COMPETITIVENESS

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of the legislative branch's inquiry into policies that affect the operational costs, regulatory environment, and workforce development for the U.S. maritime and shipbuilding industries.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Maritime Industry

The industry is subject to the regulatory and economic policies discussed during the hearing.

Maritime Labor Unions

Unions representing seafarers and maritime workers are affected by policies regarding industry competitiveness and workforce development.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a March 6, 2019, House Subcommittee hearing focused on identifying strategies to improve the regulation, economic health, and global competitiveness of the U.S. maritime and shipbuilding sectors. The hearing featured testimony from government officials, maritime college leadership, and industry representatives.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 6, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
  • The primary objective was to discuss strategies for improving regulation, economic opportunities, and competitiveness in the maritime and shipbuilding sectors.
  • Testimony was provided by two panels consisting of government officials, academic leaders, and industry representatives.
  • Panel 1 included representatives from the U.S. Coast Guard and the Maritime Administration.
  • Panel 2 included representatives from SUNY Maritime College, The American Waterways Operators, the National Association of Waterfront Employers, Crowley Maritime Corp., and the Seafarers International Union.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather information and expert testimony on how to improve the regulatory environment and economic competitiveness of the U.S. maritime and shipbuilding industries.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the U.S. Coast Guard and Maritime Administration, the President of SUNY Maritime College, and representatives from various maritime industry and labor organizations.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of the legislative branch's inquiry into policies that affect the operational costs, regulatory environment, and workforce development for the U.S. maritime and shipbuilding industries.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Competitiveness

The hearing highlights a strategic shift toward evaluating maritime regulation specifically through the lens of global economic competitiveness.

Connected Entities

personSean Patrick MaloneyChair of the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime TransportationMap →
personMark H. BuzbyAdministrator, Maritime AdministrationMap →
organizationAmerican Maritime PartnershipIndustry advocacy group represented by Michael G. RobertsMap →
personMichael AlfultisPresident, SUNY Maritime CollegeMap →
personJohn P. NadeauRear Admiral, Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast GuardMap →
personBob GibbsRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
organizationSeafarers International UnionLabor organization represented by Augustin TellezMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record