POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofbudget
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Proposed 2024 Budget for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Original title: THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2024 BUDGET

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The proposed budget would fund 225 new full-time employees to accelerate environmental reviews for infrastructure projects, directly impacting the speed at which clean energy and construction projects can be approved.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

The agency would receive an 18% budget increase and authorization to hire 225 new full-time employees.

Infrastructure project developers

Developers may experience changes in the speed of the federal permitting and environmental review process.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held a hearing to review the President's proposed $2 billion budget for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for fiscal year 2024. This proposal represents an 18% increase over 2023 funding levels, aimed primarily at addressing staffing shortages and increasing the agency's capacity to process environmental permits for infrastructure projects.

Key Facts

  • The President's fiscal year 2024 budget request for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is just over $2 billion.
  • This request represents an 18% increase in funding compared to 2023 enacted levels.
  • The budget includes a $50 million increase specifically for planning and consultation activities.
  • The funding increase is intended to support the hiring of 225 additional full-time employees.
  • The agency expects the additional staff to complete over 280 more formal consultations and 3,100 more informal consultations annually.
  • The hearing addressed the agency's role in the federal permitting process for projects authorized under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act.

Why It Matters

The proposed budget would fund 225 new full-time employees to accelerate environmental reviews for infrastructure projects, directly impacting the speed at which clean energy and construction projects can be approved.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the Fish and Wildlife Service need more money for permitting?
The agency is responsible for environmental reviews required by law for infrastructure projects. Recent legislation like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has increased the number of projects requiring review, but previous funding did not account for this increased workload, leading to backlogs.
How will the proposed budget affect infrastructure projects?
The budget aims to hire 225 new staff members to process environmental reviews more efficiently, which the agency expects will increase the number of formal and s completed annually.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Resource Gap in Infrastructure Laws

The hearing highlights a disconnect where recent major infrastructure laws (BIL, IRA) mandated increased environmental review workloads without providing the corresponding funding for the agency to execute those reviews.

Connected Entities

personShelley Moore CapitoRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public WorksMap →
personMartha WilliamsDirector of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceMap →
personThomas R. CarperChairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public WorksMap →
organizationU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceThe federal agency requesting the budgetMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record