POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofhuman trafficking →
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Using the Financial System to Stop Human Trafficking

Original title: ENDING EXPLOITATION: HOW THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM CAN WORK TO DISMANTLE THE BUSINESS OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING

January 1, 2021

human traffickingfinancial regulationnational securityanti-money launderinginternational development

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing explores potential legislative and regulatory changes to how banks and financial firms monitor transactions to prevent the funding of human trafficking, which could impact compliance requirements for financial institutions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Financial Institutions

Banks and financial firms may face increased scrutiny or new regulatory requirements regarding transaction monitoring for human trafficking indicators.

Human Trafficking Survivors

Advocates for survivors provided testimony to inform policy changes aimed at disrupting the financial incentives of their traffickers.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy held a virtual hearing to examine how financial institutions can identify and disrupt the business operations of human trafficking networks. Experts and advocates provided testimony on the role of global finance in dismantling these criminal enterprises.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 25, 2021, by the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy.
  • The purpose of the hearing was to discuss how the financial system can be utilized to dismantle human trafficking business models.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from academia, legal practice, and survivor advocacy groups.
  • The hearing included the submission of prepared statements and responses to questions for the record from witnesses.
  • The subcommittee is part of the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the goal of this hearing?
The goal was to examine how financial institutions and regulatory frameworks can be used to identify and stop the financial transactions that support human trafficking.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Luis C. deBaca (Yale University), Rev. Dr. Marian Hatcher (SPACE International), Barry M. Koch (Liechtenstein Initiative), Laila Mickelwait (Traffickinghub Movement), and Louise Shelley (George Mason University).

Why It Matters

This hearing explores potential legislative and regulatory changes to how banks and financial firms monitor transactions to prevent the funding of human trafficking, which could impact compliance requirements for financial institutions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Financial Disruption

The hearing signals a shift toward using financial intelligence and banking regulations as a primary tool for combating human trafficking.

Committee on Financial Services

Connected Entities

personLouise Shelley“Witness, Director of TraCCC at George Mason University”Map →
personMarian Hatcher“Witness, USA Representative for SPACE International”Map →
personLuis C. deBaca“Witness, Senior Fellow at Yale University Law School”Map →
personBarry M. Koch“Witness, Commissioner of the Liechtenstein Initiative”Map →
personLaila Mickelwait“Witness, Founder of Traffickinghub Movement”Map →
personJim A. Himes“Chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and”Map →
organizationCommittee on Financial Services“U.S. House of Representatives committee overseeing the hearing”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record