Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Homestead Tax Exemption and First Responder Funding
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
If passed by voters, this would have significantly altered local government revenue streams by removing non-school property tax income while simultaneously locking in minimum spending requirements for public safety agencies.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Homeowners
They would have received an exemption from non-school property taxes on their primary residences.
Local governments
They would have faced a reduction in property tax revenue while being mandated to maintain specific funding levels for public safety.
First responders
Their departmental budgets would have been protected by a state-mandated funding floor.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did this bill become law?
What would have happened to my property taxes?
How would this have affected local police and fire budgets?
Why It Matters
If passed by voters, this would have significantly altered local government revenue streams by removing non-school property tax income while simultaneously locking in minimum spending requirements for public safety agencies.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
80
No
30
Present
0
Not Voting
7
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · no
Josie Tomkow
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · no
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · no
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · no
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Dan Daley
Democratic · no
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Susan Valdés
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · no
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Daniel Perez
Republican · yes
+ 93 more
A - 913429, Adoption, Second Reading
Total
117
Yes
31
No
76
Present
0
Not Voting
10
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · no
Traci Koster
Republican · no
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Webster Barnaby
Republican · no
Rob Long
Democratic · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · no
Brad Yeager
Republican · no
Danny Alvarez
Republican · no
John Snyder
Republican · no
Tom Fabricio
Republican · not voting
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · no
Chuck Brannan
Republican · no
Rachel Plakon
Republican · no
Toby Overdorf
Republican · no
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Allison Tant
Democratic · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · no
Dave Smith
Republican · no
Nathan Boyles
Republican · not voting
Hillary Cassel
Republican · no
Lisa Dunkley
Democratic · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · not voting
Dean Black
Republican · no
+ 93 more
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Ways & Means Committee)
Total
19
Yes
11
No
5
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (19)
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · no
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · no
Adam Botana
Republican · not voting
Kelly Skidmore
Democratic · no
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Webster Barnaby
Republican · not voting
Bill Partington
Republican · yes
Chad Johnson
Republican · yes
Monique Miller
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · not voting
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · no
Wyman Duggan
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Tom Fabricio
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Favorable With Committee Substitute (State Affairs Committee)
Total
26
Yes
16
No
6
Present
0
Not Voting
4
Abstain
0
How they voted (26)
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · not voting
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Wyman Duggan
Republican · not voting
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · not voting
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · no
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Jim Mooney
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Will Robinson
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · no
Lindsay Cross
Democratic · no
Fabián Basabe
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · no
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · not voting
Angie Nixon
Democratic · no
+ 2 more
Favorable (Select Committee on Property Taxes)
Total
37
Yes
24
No
10
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (37)
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · no
Richard Gentry
Republican · yes
Monique Miller
Republican · yes
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · no
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Berny Jacques
Republican · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · no
Griff Griffitts
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · not voting
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · no
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · no
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
Mike Gottlieb
Democratic · no
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Dean Black
Republican · yes
Kevin Steele
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
+ 13 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Mandatory Funding Floor
The bill attempted to decouple local government revenue (via tax exemptions) from local government expenditure (via mandated public safety funding floors).
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools