POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on the 2016 Department of Defense Budget

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the stage for how the federal government will allocate defense funding for 2016, specifically addressing the impact of and the use of war-funding accounts on military operations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency is subject to the 2016 budget appropriations and fiscal constraints discussed in the hearing.

Servicemembers

Servicemembers are impacted by military operational tempo, sexual assault reporting policies, and potential changes to educational benefits.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Subcommittee on Defense Appropriations held its final hearing on the 2016 Department of Defense budget request. The session featured testimony from Secretary of Defense Ash Carter and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey regarding national security priorities and fiscal challenges.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was the final scheduled session for the fiscal year 2016 defense budget request.
  • General Martin Dempsey is scheduled to end his term as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in October 2015.
  • Senator Durbin criticized the practice of shifting base budget funds to the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account to bypass sequestration.
  • The Department of Defense reported an estimated 20,000 instances of sexual assault against servicemembers in the previous year.
  • Over 50% of individuals who report sexual assault in the military experience retaliation.
  • Military operations are currently active in Afghanistan, Africa, the Pacific, Eastern Europe, Iraq, and Syria.
  • The subcommittee is reviewing concerns regarding predatory for-profit colleges targeting servicemembers and their families.
  • The subcommittee is reviewing the Department of Defense's ability to track contractors.

Why It Matters

This hearing sets the stage for how the federal government will allocate defense funding for 2016, specifically addressing the impact of and the use of war-funding accounts on military operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'Overseas Contingency Operations' (OCO) account?
It is a war-funding account that some lawmakers are proposing to use to shift funds from the base defense budget to avoid limits.
What is sequestration?
A fiscal mechanism involving automatic, across-the-board spending cuts that the Department of Defense is currently attempting to navigate.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift to OCO Funding

Lawmakers are actively debating the use of war-funding accounts to circumvent base budget spending caps, a practice criticized as a 'budget gimmick'.

Connected Entities

personAsh CarterSecretary of DefenseMap →
personThad CochranChairman of the Subcommittee on Defense AppropriationsMap →
personDeanie DempseyWife of General Martin DempseyMap →
personMike McCordUnder Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial OfficerMap →
personRichard J. DurbinVice Chairman of the SubcommitteeMap →
personMartin DempseyChairman of the Joint Chiefs of StaffMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record