POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Motion Picture Association of America (Q1 2000)

Original title: NEFF/THOMAS INC. lobbying for MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report reveals the financial investment and legislative priorities of the film industry in California, specifically identifying the $37,001 spent to influence 15 different state bills during early 2000.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Motion Picture Association of America

The organization incurred costs to influence state legislative outcomes.

Neff/Thomas Inc.

The firm received payment for professional lobbying services provided to the MPAA.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses payments made by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to the firm Neff/Thomas Inc. during the first quarter of 2000. It lists the specific legislative bills the firm monitored or influenced on behalf of the association.

Key Facts

  • The lobbying firm Neff/Thomas Inc. received $37,001 for services provided to the MPAA between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2000.
  • The lobbying activity covered seven Assembly Bills: AB 1712, AB 1853, AB 1714, AB 1998, AB 1717, AB 1934, and AB 1490.
  • The lobbying activity covered eight Senate Bills: SB 129, SB 996, SB 1254, SB 1319, SB 1384, SB 1385, SB 1412, SB 1480, and SB 2184.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did the MPAA spend on lobbying in early 2000?
The MPAA paid $37,001 to the firm Neff/Thomas Inc. for the period of January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
Which bills was the MPAA tracking during this time?
The firm was active on 15 specific pieces of legislation, including Assembly Bills 1712, 1853, 1714, 1998, 1717, 1934, 1490 and Senate Bills 129, 996, 1254, 1319, 1384, 1385, 1412, 1480, and 2184.

Why It Matters

This report reveals the financial investment and legislative priorities of the film industry in California, specifically identifying the $37,001 spent to influence 15 different state bills during early 2000.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

NEFF/THOMAS INC.

on behalf of MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

Senate LDAView filing →

NEFF/THOMAS INC.

on behalf of MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

Senate LDAView filing →

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

High Volume Legislative Monitoring

The MPAA engaged in monitoring or influencing 15 distinct pieces of legislation in a single quarter, indicating a broad legislative interest during the 2000 session.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record