POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR9530FEDERALIN_COMMITTEE
High Impact

The COLUMBIA Act of 2024

Original title: COLUMBIA Act of 2024

September 10, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently IN_COMMITTEE. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, colleges identified as having high levels of antisemitic activity would be legally required to pay for the expenses of an independent monitor and implement oversight agreements, directly impacting university administrative budgets and campus policy enforcement.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Institutions of higher education

Colleges and universities receiving federal funds may be required to enter into monitorship agreements and cover the costs of third-party monitors.

Department of Education

The agency is tasked with establishing the monitor program, developing agreements, and publishing monitor reports.

What changed

Current stage: IN_COMMITTEE.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Background

  • The bill is part of a broader legislative effort to address reports of rising antisemitism on college campuses following the events of October 7, 2023. context

Summary

This bill would require the U.S. Secretary of Education to appoint independent, third-party monitors to oversee colleges and universities that have high rates of antisemitic activity. These monitors would be responsible for evaluating campus progress in combating antisemitism and reporting their findings to the public and Congress.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

If passed, colleges identified as having high levels of antisemitic activity would be legally required to pay for the expenses of an independent monitor and implement oversight agreements, directly impacting university administrative budgets and campus policy enforcement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who pays for the antisemitism monitors?
The institutions of higher education themselves are required to provide for the reasonable expenses of the monitors.
How will the government decide which colleges get a monitor?
The Secretary of Education will use data provided by the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights to identify institutions with a high incidence of antisemitic activity.
Will the monitor's reports be public?
Yes, quarterly progress reports must be made publicly available on the websites of both the institution and the Department of Education.

News Coverage

Sponsors

Connected Entities

organizationCongressReceives annual reportsMap →
bill_numberHigher Education Act of 1965The legal basis for the programMap →
organizationState and local governmentsReceives annual reportsMap →
organizationSecretary of EducationResponsible for establishing and overseeing the programMap →
organizationOffice for Civil RightsProvides data to the Secretary of EducationMap →
personMr. LawlerCo-sponsor of the billMap →
personMr. Torres of New YorkSponsor of the billMap →
organizationDepartment of EducationWebsite for public reportingMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record