House Oversight Committee Hearing on Abortion Access
January 1, 2022
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing served as a formal congressional record of testimony regarding the legal and medical landscape of abortion access, influencing the legislative discourse surrounding the Women's Health Protection Act and related federal policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Reproductive healthcare providers
Medical professionals provided testimony regarding the clinical and legal environment of abortion services.
Congressional members
Committee members participated in the hearing to deliberate on federal policy and oversight.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on September 30, 2021, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The committee heard testimony from two panels consisting of members of Congress, activists, legal scholars, and OB/GYNs.
- The hearing record includes an amicus brief regarding Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
- The record includes articles regarding the science of pregnancy and opposition to the Women's Health Protection Act.
- The record includes correspondence between Committee Republicans and the Biden Administration.
- The hearing was convened to examine the protection and expansion of abortion rights and access.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing served as a formal congressional record of testimony regarding the legal and medical landscape of abortion access, influencing the legislative discourse surrounding the Women's Health Protection Act and related federal policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Pre-Dobbs Legislative Activity
The hearing record explicitly includes an amicus brief for the Dobbs case, indicating active congressional engagement with the Supreme Court case months before the final ruling.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment30Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools