POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR1504FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

China Trade Relations Act of 2025

February 21, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Feb 21, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would fundamentally change the legal framework for U.S.-China trade, likely resulting in higher tariffs on Chinese imports and restricting U.S. government-backed credit or investment guarantees for Chinese entities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Importers

Businesses importing goods from China would face potential tariff increases if normal trade relations are withdrawn.

Chinese Government

The government would be subject to new reporting requirements and potential loss of U.S. credit and investment guarantees.

U.S. Exporters

Exporters may face retaliatory trade measures or loss of access to the Chinese market.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes to revoke '' status for the People's Republic of China. It would require the President to certify that China meets specific human rights and labor standards before trade privileges, U.S. credit programs, or commercial agreements could be restored.

Key Facts

  • The bill immediately withdraws 'normal trade relations' status from the People's Republic of China upon enactment.
  • Future trade relations would be subject to the requirements of Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974.
  • The President is prohibited from concluding commercial agreements or providing credit/investment guarantees to China if they are found in violation of specific human rights or labor standards.
  • Specific criteria for ineligibility include: use of prison labor, operation of 'vocational training' or concentration camps, economic espionage, and failure to protect religious/cultural heritage in Tibet.
  • The President must submit reports to Congress on June 30 and December 31 of each year regarding China's compliance with these standards.
  • The President is granted authority to waive these restrictions for 12-month periods if they determine it promotes the bill's objectives and receive assurances of future compliance.
  • A temporary 90-day waiver authority is established upon enactment to bridge the transition period.
  • The bill expands the scope of the Trade Act of 1974 to explicitly include 'human rights' alongside 'east-west trade' in its section heading.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would fundamentally change the legal framework for U.S.-China trade, likely resulting in higher tariffs on Chinese imports and restricting U.S. government-backed credit or investment guarantees for Chinese entities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does 'normal trade relations' mean?
It is a legal designation that allows a country to trade with the U.S. under the same tariff and regulatory conditions as most other trading partners.
Does this bill permanently ban trade with China?
No, it creates a mechanism where trade privileges can be restored or maintained only if the President certifies that China is not violating specific human rights and labor standards.
Can the President bypass these restrictions?
Yes, the President has the authority to issue a 12-month waiver if they determine it serves the objectives of the Act and receive assurances of future compliance.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Return to Cold War-era Trade Framework

The bill explicitly seeks to re-apply Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974, which was the primary mechanism for managing trade with the Soviet Union and other non-market economies during the Cold War.

Connected Entities

personMr. TiffanyCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMr. Smith of New JerseyPrimary sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMr. OglesCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
locationPeople's Republic of ChinaThe subject of the trade status changes.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record