POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on International Financial Institutions and Global Competition

Original title: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN AN ERA OF GREAT POWER COMPETITION

January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing informs potential future legislation regarding U.S. funding and policy influence within international financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF, which affects how global development and financial stability are managed.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Taxpayers

Taxpayer funds support U.S. contributions to international financial institutions.

International Financial Institutions

These organizations are the subject of congressional oversight and potential policy changes regarding their operations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial Institutions held a hearing on May 25, 2023, to discuss the role of international financial organizations in the context of global power competition. Experts provided testimony on how these institutions function and their impact on U.S. national interests.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 25, 2023, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The subcommittee examined the influence of international financial institutions (IFIs) in the context of great power competition.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony regarding global economics and IFI operations.
  • A GAO report titled 'World Bank, Borrower Countries' Contracts to Businesses in the U.S. and to Entities Potentially on U.S. Sanctions or Other Lists of Concern' was submitted for the record.
  • Written responses to questions for the record were submitted by Richard J. Powell and Daniel F. Runde.
  • An article titled 'China is using the World Bank as its piggybank' was submitted for the record by Representative French Hill.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this subcommittee?
The Subcommittee on National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial Institutions oversees matters related to U.S. participation in international financial institutions and monitors illicit finance activities.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included Richard J. Powell (ClearPath, Inc.), Mark Rosen (Advection Growth Capital), Daniel F. Runde (CSIS), Jesse M. Schreger (Columbia Business School), and Daouda Sembene (AfriCatalyst).

Why It Matters

This hearing informs potential future legislation regarding U.S. funding and policy influence within international financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF, which affects how global development and financial stability are managed.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

GAO Oversight

The hearing incorporated a specific GAO report regarding World Bank contracts and potential sanctions risks.

Connected Entities

organizationWorld BankInternational financial institution discussedMap →
organizationInternational Monetary FundInternational financial institution discussedMap →
personDaniel F. RundeSenior VP at CSIS, witnessMap →
personRichard J. PowellCEO of ClearPath, Inc., witnessMap →
personMark RosenPartner at Advection Growth Capital, former Acting U.S. Executive Director at thMap →
personBlaine LuetkemeyerChairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, Illicit Finance, and InternatMap →
personDaouda SembeneCEO of AfriCatalyst, witnessMap →
personJesse M. SchregerProfessor at Columbia Business School, witnessMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record