POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR6617FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

Keeping All Students Safe Act (H.R. 6617)

Original title: Keeping All Students Safe Act

December 11, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Dec 11, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this law would set national standards for how schools manage student behavior, potentially changing disciplinary policies and reporting requirements for all public and some private schools receiving federal funds.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Students

Students are subject to new federal protections regarding the types of physical and chemical interventions that can be used on them in school settings.

School Personnel

Teachers, paraprofessionals, and school leaders must adhere to new federal prohibitions on specific restraint and seclusion methods.

State Educational Agencies

These agencies are required to develop state plans, report data, and manage federal grants related to school safety and restraint policies.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes federal regulations to prohibit the use of , mechanical restraints, s, and dangerous physical restraints that restrict breathing in schools. It also establishes requirements for state educational agencies to develop safety plans, report on restraint usage, and provides for federal grants to support these initiatives.

Key Facts

  • Prohibits the use of seclusion, mechanical restraint, chemical restraint, and physical restraints that restrict breathing in schools.
  • Requires state educational agencies to develop and implement state plans regarding restraint and seclusion policies.
  • Establishes federal grant programs for state educational agencies to improve school safety and behavioral support systems.
  • Mandates reporting requirements for schools regarding the use of physical restraint.
  • Defines 'chemical restraint' as drugs used to control behavior not prescribed by a physician for a medical condition.
  • Defines 'seclusion' as involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room from which they cannot leave.
  • Excludes law enforcement officers and school security guards from the definition of 'program personnel' subject to these specific restrictions.
  • Applies to public schools, Head Start programs, and private schools that enroll students receiving special education services under IDEA.
  • Authorizes federal appropriations to fund the implementation of the Act.
  • Requires a national assessment of restraint and seclusion practices in schools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill ban all physical contact between teachers and students?
No. The bill distinguishes between 'physical restraint' and 'physical escort,' which is defined as temporary touching or holding to guide a student to a safe location.
Does this apply to private schools?
It applies to private schools that enroll students receiving special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Are school resource officers covered by these rules?
No. The bill explicitly excludes law enforcement officers and school security guards from the definition of 'program personnel' governed by these specific restrictions.

Why It Matters

If passed, this law would set national standards for how schools manage student behavior, potentially changing disciplinary policies and reporting requirements for all public and some private schools receiving federal funds.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Exclusion of Law Enforcement

The bill explicitly excludes law enforcement officers and school security guards from the definition of 'program personnel,' creating a potential regulatory gap between school staff and security personnel.

Connected Entities

personMr. BeyerPrimary sponsor of the billMap →
organizationCommittee on Education and WorkforcePrimary committee of jurisdictionMap →
organizationDepartment of EducationThe Secretary of Education is responsible for oversightMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record