Congressional Hearing on International Apprenticeship Models
January 1, 2021
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing explored potential policy shifts in how the U.S. funds and structures vocational training, which could impact future federal workforce development programs and educational grants.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Workforce development agencies
These agencies may be subject to future policy changes or funding adjustments based on the findings of this subcommittee.
Vocational students
Students pursuing trade education may see changes in program availability or structure if international models are adopted.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on July 16, 2019, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The subcommittee examined apprenticeship models from Germany, Switzerland, and Australia.
- Witnesses included experts from the Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (Germany), the Embassy of Australia, and Swisscore (Switzerland).
- The hearing record includes submitted slides on Australian apprenticeship data and an article regarding the U.S. need for more tradespeople.
- Written responses to questions for the record were provided by Dr. Annen, Mr. Bradley, and Dr. Marti.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing explored potential policy shifts in how the U.S. funds and structures vocational training, which could impact future federal workforce development programs and educational grants.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
International Benchmarking
The committee explicitly sought to use international vocational models as a benchmark for U.S. policy reform.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools