POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record
Finance Detected

Proposed Retirement Age Extension for Capitol Police Officers

Original title: AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE RETIREMENT AGE FOR MEMBER OF THE CAPITOL POLICE

May 19, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$26,901across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
ALASKANS FOR DAN SULLIVANR SENATE PAC$5,000-Dec 2024
Douglas E SullivanDouglas Sullivan$3,950Real<br>Estate<br>BrokerFeb 2026
SULLIVAN VICTORYWEAVER, ALLEN$3,500RETIREDMar 2026
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024CREPAC California Real Estate Action Committee$3,000-Jun 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Small Contributor Committee$1,500-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Small Contributor Committee$1,500-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Small Contributor Committee$1,500-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$617-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$617-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$617-Aug 2024
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024Gloria Marin$600RealtorJun 2024
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020
Sullivan, Foster City Council, November 5, 2024Felino Amistad$500realtorJun 2024
Ron Sullivan for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) Director 2020NELSON CHUNG$500PRESIDENTJan 2020

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

The Frame

What this does

The bill aims to address staffing shortages by allowing experienced Capitol Police officers to continue working past age 60 if the Capitol Police Board determines they remain fit for duty.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Capitol Police Officers

Officers nearing retirement age may be eligible to continue working until age 62 if granted a waiver by the Board.

Capitol Police Board

The Board is granted new discretionary authority to determine retirement age waivers for officers up to age 62.

What changed

Last recorded activity May 19, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This bill allows the Capitol Police Board to grant retirement age waivers to s until they reach age 62. Currently, officers are generally required to retire at age 57, with limited waivers available only until age 60.

Key Facts

  • S. 4530 amends title 5 of the United States Code regarding retirement ages for Capitol Police.
  • The bill authorizes the Capitol Police Board to set a retirement age for officers between 57 and 62 years old.
  • Currently, officers are generally forced to retire at age 57, with waivers only extending service until age 60.
  • Approximately 60 sworn officers are currently working under existing retirement age waivers.
  • The bill grants the Capitol Police Board discretion to determine if an officer is fit for continued service.
  • The legislation is intended to mitigate staffing shortages within the Capitol Police force.
  • The bill does not change the statutory retirement age, but rather expands the waiver flexibility for the Board.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill force all Capitol Police officers to work until age 62?
No. It gives the Capitol Police Board the authority to grant waivers allowing officers to continue working up to age 62 if they are willing and deemed fit for duty.
Why is this change being proposed?
The bill is intended to address staffing shortages by retaining experienced officers who would otherwise be forced to retire at age 60.

Why It Matters

The bill aims to address staffing shortages by allowing experienced Capitol Police officers to continue working past age 60 if the Capitol Police Board determines they remain fit for duty.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Administrative Discretion

The bill shifts retirement age determination from a fixed statutory limit to a discretionary waiver system managed by the Capitol Police Board.

Connected Entities

personSteve ScaliseRepresentative from Louisiana who spoke in support of the bill.Map →
organizationUnited States Capitol PoliceThe law enforcement agency affected by the retirement age change.Map →
organizationCapitol Police BoardThe body granted authority to determine retirement age waivers.Map →
personSullivanCurrent Chief of the Capitol Police.Map →
personJoseph MorelleRepresentative from New York who spoke in support of the bill.Map →
personMangerFormer Chief of the Capitol Police.Map →
personBryan SteilRepresentative from Wisconsin who moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record