Part ofDepartment of Defense →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Senate Hearing on Department of Defense Management Reform

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REFORM: OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT

January 1, 2016

Department of Defense Defense Reform Government Management Military Spending National Security

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the Department of Defense's inability to track expenses and the resulting reduction in combat assets like ships and aircraft, which impacts national defense resource allocation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency is subject to oversight regarding its management practices and overhead spending.

Military personnel

The availability of combat resources and equipment is tied to the efficiency of the Department's management.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Armed Services held a hearing to discuss systemic management inefficiencies within the Department of Defense. Witnesses and committee members examined the growth of 'back office' costs and the decline in combat power despite consistent spending levels over the last thirty years.

Key Facts

The Department of Defense is spending the same amount in constant dollars as it did 30 years ago.
Current combat power compared to 30 years ago: 35% fewer combat brigades, 53% fewer ships, and 63% fewer aircraft squadrons.
The Department of Defense cannot produce complete or reliable data on its own overhead expenses.
The Department's overhead elements, specifically the contracted workforce, have increased significantly.
The committee is prioritizing the development of a new strategy to address ISIL following recent global attacks.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the Department of Defense's inability to track expenses and the resulting reduction in combat assets like ships and aircraft, which impacts national defense resource allocation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Senate Committee on Armed Services reviewing Department of Defense management?

The committee is concerned that despite consistent spending, the military has significantly fewer combat assets than it did 30 years ago due to rising costs.

What is the 'back office' of the Department of Defense?

The term refers to the administrative and management functions of the Department, including the contracted workforce, rather than direct combat operations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

DOD Data Transparency Gap

The hearing explicitly identifies that the Department of Defense lacks the internal data systems necessary to track its own overhead expenses.

Department of Defense

Connected Entities

personLisa Bisaccia“Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at CVS Health Corpora”Map →

organizationDepartment of Defense“The federal department under review for management reform”Map →

personJohn McCain“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services”Map →

organizationCVS Health Corporation“Private sector company providing human resources perspective”Map →

personDavid M. Walker“Former Comptroller General of the United States”Map →

personRichard V. Spencer“Former member of the Defense Business Board”Map →

personArnold L. Punaro“Major General USMC (Ret.) and member of the Defense Business Board”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance85
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy40
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment20
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz30
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools