POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Payment Disclosure: Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

Original title: Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP lobbying for California Legislative Conference on Interior Design

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The document clarifies that the $6,000 payment was for past-due invoices related to lobbying services that concluded on June 30, 1998, rather than for active lobbying work during the 2000 reporting period.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

The firm is required to disclose the receipt of funds related to past lobbying contracts.

California Legislative Conference on Interior Design

The organization is identified as the source of the payment for past services.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses a $6,000 payment received by the law firm Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP from the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design for the period of April 1, 2000, to June 30, 2000.

Key Facts

  • The reporting period for this disclosure is April 1, 2000, through June 30, 2000.
  • Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP received $6,000 from the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design.
  • The payment was for past-due invoices for services provided prior to June 30, 1998.
  • The firm's role as a lobbyist employer for this client terminated on June 30, 1998.
  • No new lobbying activity occurred during the April 2000 to June 2000 reporting period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did this firm lobby for the California Legislative Conference on Interior Design in 2000?
No. The document states that the firm's role as a lobbyist for this client ended on June 30, 1998.
Why was this payment reported in 2000?
The $6,000 payment was made to settle past-due invoices for services rendered before the contract ended in 1998.

Why It Matters

The document clarifies that the $6,000 payment was for past-due invoices related to lobbying services that concluded on June 30, 1998, rather than for active lobbying work during the 2000 reporting period.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Settlement

The disclosure highlights a significant time gap between the termination of services (1998) and the receipt of payment (2000).

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record