POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Federal Public Land Access

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING ON EXAMINING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S EFFORTS TO LIMIT ACCESS TO PUBLIC LANDS

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of congressional inquiry into federal land management policies, which directly impacts how local governments and citizens can utilize, develop, or access public lands in their jurisdictions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Local and State Government Officials

These officials provide testimony on how federal land management policies impact their specific jurisdictions and local land access.

Mining and Exploration Associations

These organizations submitted statements for the record regarding the impact of land access policies on their industries.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing on May 24, 2023, to examine claims that the Biden administration is restricting public access to federal lands. The session included testimony from local and state officials regarding land management policies.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on Wednesday, May 24, 2023, in the Longworth House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations convened to review Biden administration policies regarding public land access.
  • Chairman Paul Gosar authorized the participation of non-subcommittee members, including Representatives Hageman and LaMalfa.
  • Oral opening statements were restricted to the Chairman and the Ranking Member per Committee Rule 4(f).
  • Witnesses included local and state officials from Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona.
  • The record includes submissions from the American Exploration & Mining Association and the National Mining Association.
  • The record includes a Las Vegas Sun article regarding monument designation criticism.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine and gather testimony regarding the Biden administration's efforts to limit access to public lands.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Todd Devlin (Prairie County Commissioner, MT), J.J. Goicoechea (Director, Nevada Department of Agriculture), Stephanie Garcia Richard (New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands), and Travis Lingenfelter (Chairman, Mohave County Board of Supervisors, AZ).

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of congressional inquiry into federal land management policies, which directly impacts how local governments and citizens can utilize, develop, or access public lands in their jurisdictions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Federal-Local Friction

The hearing highlights a recurring pattern of local and state officials challenging federal land management decisions, specifically regarding monument designations and access restrictions.

Connected Entities

organizationCommittee on Natural ResourcesHouse committee overseeing the subcommitteeMap →
personMelanie A. StansburyRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personStephanie Garcia RichardNew Mexico Commissioner of Public LandsMap →
personTodd DevlinPrairie County Commissioner, MontanaMap →
personTravis LingenfelterChairman, Mohave County Board of Supervisors, ArizonaMap →
personPaul GosarChairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →
personJ.J. GoicoecheaDirector, Nevada Department of AgricultureMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record