Proposed Changes to Digital Voyeurism Privacy Laws
January 9, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Died in Messages. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
11 actions- Feb 26, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/03/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
- Feb 19, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building --Temporarily Postponed
- Feb 13, 2026SenateNow in Rules
- Feb 12, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
- Feb 9, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 02/12/26, 4:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
- Feb 3, 2026SenateNow in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
Show 5 earlier actions
- Feb 2, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Criminal Justice; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
- Jan 28, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Criminal Justice, 02/02/26, 3:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
- Jan 22, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced
- Jan 16, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Criminal Justice; Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Rules
- Jan 9, 2026SenateIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill sought to modernize the legal standard for privacy in the digital age, which would have impacted how prosecutors define and pursue criminal charges for in Florida.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Florida residents
The bill would have established clearer legal protections for individuals in private spaces against unauthorized recording.
Law enforcement and prosecutors
The bill would have provided updated legal definitions to be used when investigating and charging cases of digital voyeurism.
Last recorded activity January 9, 2026.
Introduced.
Background
- Digital voyeurism is a criminal offense in Florida that prohibits the unauthorized recording or viewing of individuals in private settings. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is digital voyeurism?
Did this bill become law?
Why It Matters
The bill sought to modernize the legal standard for privacy in the digital age, which would have impacted how prosecutors define and pursue criminal charges for in Florida.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
34
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · excused
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · excused
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · excused
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
+ 15 more
Favorable
Total
21
Yes
21
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (21)
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Favorable
Total
8
Yes
5
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Favorable
Total
9
Yes
9
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative Consensus
The bill achieved unanimous support (YEAS 34 NAYS 0) in the Senate, suggesting strong bipartisan agreement on the need to clarify privacy protections.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools