POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR8551FEDERALin_committee

Confronting CCP Malign Influence Act (H.R. 8551)

Original title: Confronting CCP Malign Influence Act

April 28, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).May 23, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would force the U.S. intelligence community to publicly disclose information on the financial assets and alleged corruption of high-ranking Chinese officials, potentially impacting U.S.-China diplomatic relations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Director of National Intelligence

The office is mandated to produce a specific report and provide testimony to Congress within set deadlines.

Secretary of State

The office is required to consult with the Director of National Intelligence on the contents of the report.

Chinese Communist Party Leadership

The individuals named in the bill are the subjects of the required investigation into their personal wealth and alleged corrupt activities.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to produce a public report detailing the wealth and corrupt activities of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership. It also mandates that intelligence officials testify before Congress regarding these findings within 180 days of the bill becoming law.

Key Facts

  • The Director of National Intelligence must prepare and release an unclassified public report on the wealth and corrupt activities of CCP leadership.
  • The report must be completed no later than 90 days after the bill is enacted.
  • The report must cover the General Secretary, senior officials in the Central Committee, the Politburo, the Politburo Standing Committee, and regional Party Secretaries.
  • The Director of National Intelligence (or their designee) must testify in an open hearing before the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.
  • The hearing must occur no later than 180 days after the bill is enacted.
  • The Director of National Intelligence must consult with the Secretary of State while preparing the report.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would force the U.S. intelligence community to publicly disclose information on the financial assets and alleged corruption of high-ranking Chinese officials, potentially impacting U.S.-China diplomatic relations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will the report be classified?
No, the bill explicitly requires the report to be and made available to the public.
Who specifically will be investigated in this report?
The report covers the General Secretary of the CCP, senior leadership in the Central Committee, the , the Politburo Standing Committee, and regional Party Secretaries.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Mandatory Public Disclosure

The bill shifts from standard intelligence reporting to a mandatory public disclosure requirement regarding foreign leadership assets.

Connected Entities

organizationSecretary of StateRequired to consult with the Director of National Intelligence on the report.Map →
organizationDirector of National IntelligenceThe official responsible for preparing the report and testifying before CongressMap →
personAndy OglesU.S. Representative who introduced the bill.Map →
organizationPermanent Select Committee on IntelligenceHouse committee designated to receive the report and testimony.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record