POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALcongressional record
High Impact

Senate Rejects Attempt to Overturn CFPB Overdraft Rule Withdrawal

Original title: PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION RELATING TO WITHDRAWAL OF THE RULE...

May 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The vote maintains the current regulatory environment regarding overdraft fees, meaning banks are not currently required to provide the specific proof of consumer that the 2024 CFPB guidance had proposed.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Banking institutions

Financial institutions are subject to federal regulations regarding how they obtain and document consumer consent for overdraft fees.

Consumers

Consumers are subject to the overdraft fee policies and disclosure practices of their financial institutions.

What changed

Last recorded activity May 13, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The U.S. Senate voted 53-47 against a on a resolution that would have challenged the withdrawal of a 2024 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule regarding overdraft fee practices. The resolution, S.J. Res. 130, sought to reinstate stricter enforcement mechanisms for how banks obtain consumer consent for overdraft programs.

Key Facts

  • The Senate voted 53-47 to reject the motion to proceed to S.J. Res. 130.
  • S.J. Res. 130 aimed to use the Congressional Review Act to disapprove of the CFPB's withdrawal of 'Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-05'.
  • The 2024 circular required banks to show proof that consumers explicitly opted into overdraft programs.
  • Senator Van Hollen stated that some banks charge $35 per overdraft fee on transactions as small as $26.
  • The motion to proceed failed, meaning the resolution will not be debated or voted on further at this time.
  • The vote was largely split along party lines, with 47 yeas and 53 nays.

Why It Matters

The vote maintains the current regulatory environment regarding overdraft fees, meaning banks are not currently required to provide the specific proof of consumer that the 2024 CFPB guidance had proposed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the goal of S.J. Res. 130?
The resolution sought to overturn the withdrawal of a CFPB rule that required banks to provide proof that customers had opted into overdraft fee programs.
Did the resolution pass?
No, the to the resolution was rejected by a vote of 53-47.
What are overdraft opt-in practices?
Federal law requires banks to obtain a consumer's consent () before charging fees for overdrafts on debit card or ATM transactions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

60 Plus Association

2026

TAXATION/INTERNAL REVENUE CODEENVIRONMENT/SUPERFUNDCOPYRIGHT/PATENT/TRADEMARKHEALTH ISSUES

Signed a coalition letter opposing any efforts to raise the corporate tax rate above the 21% level set in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Signed a coalition in support of the Family Business Legacy Act, H.R. 6329. This legislation creates parity in the tax code between the estate and gift taxes by allowing an estate tax deduction for contributions to 501(c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) organizations. Signed a coalition letter urging opposition to proposals that would raise taxes on carried interest investment income.The letter is urging Congress to reject the misnamed Carried Interest Fairness Act, legislation recently reintroduced by Senators Tammy Baldwin, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and other progressive members of Congress. This legislation that would increase the tax rate on carried interest investment by 70%, from 23.8% to 40.8%. Signed a coalition letter in support of H.R.574 - ALIGN Act and highlight the 100% bonus depreciation provision's importance as the tax cut reauthorization efforts continue. Signed a coalition to support of repealing IRA's green new deal subsidies in reconciliation to pay for tax cuts. Signed a coalition letter regarding digital services taxes (DST) in an effort to stop Canadas imposition of a discriminatory digital services tax (DST) on U.S. firms and your efforts to include restrictions on the imposition of DSTs and other unfair digital policies in recently announced trade agreements-providing a model for future trade negotiations. Signed a coalition letter urging the President to index capital gains for inflation.

ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS

$30,000

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

CFPB Rule Enforcement

The document highlights a shift in the enforcement of overdraft opt-in requirements between the 2024 guidance and the subsequent withdrawal of that guidance.

Connected Entities

personChris Van HollenU.S. Senator who moved to proceed to the resolution.Map →
personDonald TrumpReferenced by Senator Van Hollen regarding the administration's policy changes.Map →
organizationBureau of Consumer Financial ProtectionThe federal agency responsible for the rule in question.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record