POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part oftechnology policy →
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on U.S. Competitiveness in Critical Technologies

Original title: LOSING GROUND: U.S. COMPETITIVENESS IN CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES

January 1, 2021

technology policynational securitySTEM educationresearch and developmentartificial intelligencebiotechnologyeconomic competitiveness

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the potential loss of U.S. global influence in emerging fields like AI and biotechnology, which directly impacts future job creation, national defense, and the ability to set international technology standards.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Technology Sector

Companies and researchers are affected by the availability of federal R&D funding and the national strategy for emerging technologies.

STEM Students and Educators

The pipeline for science and technology talent is a central focus of the committee's discussion on national competitiveness.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology held a hearing to examine the decline of U.S. leadership in science and technology. Experts and lawmakers discussed the impact of stagnant research funding and the need for strategic investment to maintain national security and economic growth.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on January 29, 2020, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • Non-defense research and development (R&D) funding in the U.S. has stagnated over the last 15 years.
  • The committee identified artificial intelligence and biotechnology as critical fields where U.S. leadership is at risk.
  • The U.S. is facing increased competition from other nations that are actively investing in science and technology capacity.
  • The committee reviewed the historical impact of the National Defense Education Act and the America COMPETES Act on U.S. innovation.
  • Witnesses provided oral and written testimony regarding the state of U.S. research and talent retention.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the potential loss of U.S. global influence in emerging fields like AI and biotechnology, which directly impacts future job creation, national defense, and the ability to set international technology standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main concern regarding U.S. technology?
The committee is concerned that stagnant funding and a lack of strategic investment are causing the U.S. to lose its competitive edge in critical fields like AI and biotechnology.
Why does this hearing matter to the average citizen?
The committee argues that U.S. leadership in technology is directly linked to job creation, higher standards of living, and national security.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in R&D Focus

The committee explicitly identifies a 15-year stagnation in non-defense R&D as a primary driver for current competitiveness concerns.

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

Connected Entities

personChaouki Abdallah“Executive Vice President for Research at Georgia Institute of Technology”Map →
personEric Schmidt“Founder of Schmidt Futures and Chairman of the National Security Commission on A”Map →
personEddie Bernice Johnson“Chairwoman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology”Map →
personFrank Lucas“Ranking Member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology”Map →
organizationAdvanced Research Projects Agency-Energy“Agency created under the America COMPETES Act”Map →
organizationNational Institutes of Health“Federal agency referenced regarding budget history”Map →
personDiane Souvaine“Chair of the National Science Board”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record