POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Committee Hearing on Infrastructure and Climate Change

Original title: EXAMINING HOW FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY COULD HELP MITIGATE AND ADAPT TO CLIMATE CHANGE

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a foundational record for potential future federal legislation regarding how transportation and infrastructure funding is prioritized to address climate-related risks and carbon emissions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

The committee members are responsible for drafting and reviewing legislation that may incorporate the testimony provided.

Industry and Environmental Organizations

Representatives from these groups provided testimony that may influence future federal policy and funding priorities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure held a hearing on February 26, 2019, to discuss how federal infrastructure policy can be used to address climate change. Experts and industry representatives provided testimony on strategies for and .

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on February 26, 2019, before the 116th Congress House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
  • The primary objective was to examine the intersection of federal infrastructure policy, climate change mitigation, and climate adaptation.
  • The hearing featured two panels of witnesses, including experts from environmental policy centers, academia, and industry representatives.
  • Chair Peter A. DeFazio was absent due to a snowstorm in Oregon; his statement was delivered by Vice Chair Salud O. Carbajal.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the California Air Resources Board, Georgetown Climate Center, University of Michigan, Electrification Coalition, Airlines for America, Center for American Progress, McWane, Inc., Center for Strategic and International Studies, and The Nature Conservancy.
  • Submissions for the record included statements from the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association and the Association of American Railroads.
  • A 1981 scientific article on atmospheric carbon dioxide was submitted for the record by Representative Scott Perry.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather expert testimony on how federal infrastructure policy can be adapted to mitigate the effects of climate change and help communities adapt to its impacts.
Did this hearing result in any new laws?
No, this was a committee hearing to collect information and testimony; it did not result in the passage of legislation.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a foundational record for potential future federal legislation regarding how transportation and infrastructure funding is prioritized to address climate-related risks and carbon emissions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern90% confidence

Historical Context of Climate Policy

The inclusion of a 1981 scientific article in the 2019 record highlights the long-standing nature of the climate policy debate in Congress.

Connected Entities

organizationAirlines for AmericaRepresented by Nancy N. YoungMap →
personSam GravesRanking Member of the Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureMap →
personDaniel SperlingWitness, Board Member of California Air Resources BoardMap →
organizationThe Nature ConservancyRepresented by Lynn ScarlettMap →
personPeter A. DeFazioChair of the Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureMap →
organizationCenter for American ProgressRepresented by Kevin DeGoodMap →
personVicki ArroyoWitness, Executive Director of Georgetown Climate CenterMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record