POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofEPA
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Oversight Hearing: EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt (January 2018)

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY FROM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR SCOTT PRUITT

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The document provides the formal record of congressional oversight into EPA administrative decisions, including budget cuts, workforce reductions, and regulatory changes that impact federal environmental enforcement and agency operations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The agency is subject to congressional oversight regarding its budget, staffing, and regulatory enforcement policies.

Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

The committee members are responsible for conducting oversight and questioning the EPA Administrator on agency performance.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a January 30, 2018, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works hearing featuring testimony from then-EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. It includes the hearing transcript, prepared statements, and extensive supplemental materials regarding EPA budget, travel, and regulatory policies.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on January 30, 2018, by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
  • The primary witness was EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt.
  • The record includes responses to follow-up questions from 12 different U.S. Senators.
  • Supplemental materials cover EPA workforce reductions and budget cuts.
  • Supplemental materials include documentation on EPA travel expenditures and potential conflicts of interest.
  • The record contains detailed information on EPA deregulation efforts regarding air, chemicals, hazardous waste, and water.
  • The record includes a letter from Delaware Governor John Carney addressed to Administrator Pruitt.
  • The hearing record is divided into two volumes, with Volume 2 focusing on additional oversight materials.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was an oversight session to receive testimony from the EPA Administrator regarding the agency's operations, budget, and regulatory agenda.
What specific topics are covered in the supplemental materials?
The materials cover a wide range of topics including EPA budget cuts, workforce reductions, travel expenditures, deregulation of air and water standards, and potential conflicts of interest.

Why It Matters

The document provides the formal record of congressional oversight into EPA administrative decisions, including budget cuts, workforce reductions, and regulatory changes that impact federal environmental enforcement and agency operations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Broad EPA Deregulation Agenda

The supplemental materials explicitly categorize deregulation efforts across four major sectors: air, chemicals, hazardous waste, and water, indicating a comprehensive agency-wide shift in 2018.

Connected Entities

personScott PruittAdministrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at the time of the heaMap →
organizationU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThe federal agency subject to the oversight hearing.Map →
personJohn BarrassoChairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.Map →
personJohn CarneyGovernor of Delaware who submitted a letter for the record.Map →
personThomas R. CarperRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record