POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The Frame

What this does

The directly influences how 24 federal agencies manage their IT budgets and cybersecurity protocols, impacting the efficiency and security of government digital services.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Agencies

Agencies are subject to biannual grading on their IT acquisition and management performance.

Taxpayers

Taxpayers are affected by the reported $20 billion in savings generated through improved IT system management.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Government Operations held a hearing to review the 13th iteration of the , a tool used to track how federal agencies manage and acquire information technology. The hearing highlighted the scorecard's role in improving IT security and saving taxpayers over $20 billion since 2015.

Key Facts

  • The FITARA scorecard has saved taxpayers an estimated $20 billion since its inception in 2015.
  • Between November 2015 and December 2021, the percentage of federal agencies receiving a grade of C or higher increased from 29% to 100%.
  • As of the most recent scorecard, 50% of the 24 tracked federal agencies received a grade of A or B.
  • The hearing was held on January 20, 2022, via the Zoom video platform.
  • The scorecard tracks 24 federal agencies across various IT acquisition categories.
  • The subcommittee has held more oversight hearings on FITARA than any other piece of federal legislation in the last seven years.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FITARA scorecard?
It is an oversight tool used by Congress to measure how 24 federal agencies perform in information technology acquisition and management.
How many agencies are evaluated by the scorecard?
The tracks 24 federal agencies.

Why It Matters

The directly influences how 24 federal agencies manage their IT budgets and cybersecurity protocols, impacting the efficiency and security of government digital services.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Consistent Oversight Success

The subcommittee reports a 100% success rate in agencies achieving a C grade or higher, indicating a significant shift in agency compliance since 2015.

Connected Entities

personSuzette KentCEO, Kent Advisory ServicesMap →
personGuy CavalloChief Information Officer, Office of Personnel ManagementMap →
personGerald E. ConnollyChairman of the Subcommittee on Government OperationsMap →
personAnn DunkinChief Information Officer, Department of EnergyMap →
personRichard SpiresPrincipal, Richard A. Spires ConsultingMap →
personDavid PownerExecutive Director, Center for Data-Driven Policy, MITREMap →
personCarol C. HarrisDirector, Information Technology and Cybersecurity, GAOMap →
organizationGovernment Accountability OfficeProvided data on scorecard effectiveness and savingsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record