POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Committee Hearing on the Equal Rights Amendment

Original title: THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: ACHIEVING CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY FOR ALL

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal legislative record for ongoing debates regarding the legal status of the Equal Rights Amendment and whether it should be formally adopted into the U.S. Constitution.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

ERA Coalition

The organization advocates for the formal adoption of the Equal Rights Amendment.

Independent Women's Forum

The organization provides policy analysis and testimony regarding the implications of the ERA.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Oversight and Reform held a hearing on October 21, 2021, to discuss the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and its potential inclusion in the U.S. Constitution. The session featured testimony from advocates, legal experts, and policy analysts regarding the history and current status of the amendment.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 21, 2021, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was originally written by Alice Paul over 100 years ago.
  • The ERA passed the U.S. House of Representatives in October 1971.
  • The ERA passed the U.S. Senate in 1972.
  • The original ERA proposal included a seven-year ratification time limit.
  • Congress extended the ratification deadline by three years in 1979.
  • By 1982, 35 of the required 38 states had ratified the ERA.
  • The hearing included testimony from seven witnesses representing various advocacy and policy organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the Equal Rights Amendment?
The amendment is intended to provide a constitutional guarantee of equality for women.
Why did the ERA stall in the 1980s?
The amendment reached 35 of the required 38 state s by 1982, but momentum slowed after the expiration of the congressionally mandated deadline.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal legislative record for ongoing debates regarding the legal status of the Equal Rights Amendment and whether it should be formally adopted into the U.S. Constitution.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 4 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Resurgence of ERA Interest

The document notes that interest in the ERA was revitalized in 2017 following the women's marches and the Me Too movement.

Connected Entities

personCarolyn B. MaloneyChairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and ReformMap →
personJennifer McClellanVirginia State Senator and hearing witnessMap →
personJames ComerRanking Minority Member of the CommitteeMap →
personVictoria NourseProfessor of Law at Georgetown UniversityMap →
personEleanor SmealPresident of Feminist MajorityMap →
personInez Feltscher StepmanSenior Policy Analyst at Independent Women's ForumMap →
personBamby SalcedoPresident of TransLatin@ CoalitionMap →
personCarol JenkinsPresident of the ERA CoalitionMap →
personAlyssa MilanoActor and ERA advocateMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record