Hearing on Federal and Local Law Enforcement Information Sharing
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing assesses the effectiveness of national security information networks that directly impact how local police departments receive and act upon federal terrorism and criminal intelligence.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State and local law enforcement agencies
These agencies rely on federal intelligence sharing to conduct counterterrorism and criminal investigations.
Department of Homeland Security
The agency is responsible for implementing the information-sharing policies and network expansions discussed in the hearing.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on September 8, 2016, in the Cannon House Office Building.
- The subcommittee reviewed progress on recommendations made 19 months prior regarding information sharing gaps.
- Key issues identified include the need for cyber expertise in local law enforcement and access to FBI terrorism-related data for fusion centers.
- Concerns were raised regarding the impact of encrypted communication platforms on counterterrorism investigations.
- Legislative proposals based on previous recommendations passed the House and were pending in the Senate at the time of the hearing.
- Specific recommendations previously made to the Department of Homeland Security included expanding security clearance access and empowering I&A field personnel.
Why It Matters
The hearing assesses the effectiveness of national security information networks that directly impact how local police departments receive and act upon federal terrorism and criminal intelligence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this hearing?
What are fusion centers?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Follow-up Oversight
The subcommittee explicitly used this hearing to track progress on recommendations made 19 months prior, showing a structured approach to legislative oversight.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools