POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S4321FEDERALin_committee

No Taxpayer-Funded Pensions for Sex Criminals Act

April 16, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.May 14, 2024
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, federal employees convicted of certain sex crimes on or after the date of enactment would lose their eligibility for federal pension payments.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal employees

Federal employees convicted of the specified sex crimes on or after the date of enactment would lose their eligibility for federal pension payments.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes to stop federal employees from receiving government pensions if they are convicted of specific sex-related crimes. It amends existing federal law to include these offenses as grounds for the of retirement annuities and pay.

Key Facts

  • The bill amends 5 U.S.C. § 8312 to add specific sex offenses as grounds for federal pension forfeiture.
  • Forfeiture applies to convictions occurring on or after the date of the bill's enactment.
  • The bill defines 'State' to include all 50 states, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Palau, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
  • Covered offenses include various federal crimes under Title 18, such as sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children, and human trafficking.
  • The bill covers state-level offenses that would be considered federal crimes if committed within U.S. maritime or territorial jurisdiction.
  • The bill includes technical amendments to Title 5 and Title 37 to ensure the new forfeiture rules are integrated into existing retirement and pay statutes.
  • The bill was introduced in the Senate on May 14, 2024.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to people convicted before the bill becomes law?
No, the bill explicitly states that the provisions apply to convictions occurring on or after the date of enactment.
Which specific crimes would cause a federal employee to lose their pension?
The bill lists specific sections of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, including various forms of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children, and human trafficking, as well as state-level equivalents.

Why It Matters

If passed, federal employees convicted of certain sex crimes on or after the date of enactment would lose their eligibility for federal pension payments.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Expansion of Pension Forfeiture

The bill significantly expands the list of criminal offenses that trigger the forfeiture of federal retirement benefits by incorporating a wide range of sex-related crimes.

Connected Entities

personMarsha BlackburnCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personJohn KennedyCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMarco RubioCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personKirsten GillibrandCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
organizationCommittee on Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsThe Senate committee to which the bill was referred.Map →
personRick ScottCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personJames RischCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMike CrapoCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personJoni ErnstLead sponsor of the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record