POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Surface Transportation Security in NY and NJ

Original title: PROTECTING OUR PASSENGERS: PERSPECTIVES ON SECURING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION IN NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides a public record of the security challenges and coordination efforts between federal agencies and local transit authorities, which directly impacts the safety protocols and emergency response planning for millions of daily commuters in the NY/NJ area.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Commuters in NY/NJ

The security policies and emergency response plans discussed impact the daily safety and operational procedures of regional transit systems.

Transportation Security Administration

The agency is responsible for implementing federal security policies for surface transportation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 Congressional held by the House Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications. The hearing focused on security strategies and emergency response coordination for systems in the New York and New Jersey region.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 21, 2016, in the 114th Congress.
  • The session was a field hearing conducted by the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Communications.
  • The primary focus was the security of surface transportation systems specifically within the New York and New Jersey region.
  • Testimony was provided by two panels of experts, including representatives from the TSA, Port Authority, MTA, NJ Transit Police, and Amtrak.
  • The second panel included local emergency management and law enforcement officials from Jersey City, New Jersey.
  • The hearing record includes prepared statements from all witnesses and subcommittee leadership.

Why It Matters

The hearing provides a public record of the security challenges and coordination efforts between federal agencies and local transit authorities, which directly impacts the safety protocols and emergency response planning for millions of daily commuters in the NY/NJ area.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather perspectives on how to better secure systems in the New York and New Jersey area.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the TSA, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the MTA, NJ Transit Police, Amtrak, and various emergency management and police officials from Jersey City.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regional Security Focus

The hearing highlights a specific effort by the House Committee on Homeland Security to conduct oversight at the local level in high-density transit corridors.

Connected Entities

organizationTransportation Security AdministrationFederal agency providing testimony on surface transportation securityMap →
personDaniel M. Donovan, Jr.Chairman of the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and CommunicatMap →
personDonald M. Payne, Jr.Ranking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
organizationAmtrakNational rail service providing security testimonyMap →
organizationNew Jersey Transit Police DepartmentLaw enforcement agency providing security testimonyMap →
organizationPort Authority of New York and New JerseyRegional transportation authority providing security testimonyMap →
organizationMetropolitan Transit AuthorityRegional transit agency providing security testimonyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record