POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Marine Sanctuary and Monument Access

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING ON EXAMINING BARRIERS TO ACCESS IN FEDERAL WATERS: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE MARINE SANCTUARY AND MONUMENT SYSTEM

January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explores the tension between federal environmental protections in marine areas and the ability of commercial and recreational fishers to operate in those waters, which directly impacts industry livelihoods and regional food supplies.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Commercial Fishing Industry

These groups are subject to regulations and potential area closures within marine sanctuaries and monuments.

NOAA

The agency is responsible for the management and enforcement of marine sanctuary and monument regulations.

Native Hawaiian Fishing Communities

These communities are impacted by changes in access to traditional fishing grounds within federal marine protected areas.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2024.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a House Subcommittee hearing held on September 19, 2023, to examine how marine sanctuaries and national monuments affect access to federal waters for commercial and recreational fishing. The hearing featured testimony from NOAA officials, fishing industry representatives, and community leaders regarding the balance between ocean conservation and economic activity.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on September 19, 2023, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Natural Resources.
  • The primary subject was the impact of marine sanctuaries and national monuments on access to federal waters.
  • Testimony was provided by officials from NOAA and representatives from the fishing industry, including the American Tunaboat Association and the New England Fishery Management Council.
  • The hearing record includes numerous letters and statements from fishing industry groups, such as Seafreeze Ltd. and the City of New Bedford, expressing concerns regarding ocean zoning.
  • The hearing is documented as Serial No. 118-62 of the 118th Congress.

Why It Matters

The hearing explores the tension between federal environmental protections in marine areas and the ability of commercial and recreational fishers to operate in those waters, which directly impacts industry livelihoods and regional food supplies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was conducted to investigate how federal marine sanctuaries and national monuments restrict or affect access to ocean areas for fishing and other economic activities.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included Jainey Bavishi from NOAA, as well as representatives from the American Tunaboat Association, the Coastal Villages Region Fund, the New England Fishery Management Council, and individual fishers.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Industry Pushback on Ocean Zoning

The hearing record reveals a long-standing and coordinated effort by fishing industry groups to challenge the expansion of marine monuments, dating back to at least 2015.

Connected Entities

organizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationFederal agency responsible for managing marine sanctuariesMap →
personMelanie A. StansburyRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personPaul GosarChairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →
personWilliam Johnson AilaNative Hawaiian FishermanMap →
personJainey BavishiAssistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, NOAAMap →
personBill Gibbons-FlyExecutive Director, American Tunaboat AssociationMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record