Extension of Public Meeting Secrecy for Florida Public Service Commission
April 2, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This legislation ensures that proprietary business information shared with the Florida Public Service Commission remains shielded from public disclosure indefinitely, rather than expiring on October 2, 2026.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Florida Public Service Commission
The commission retains the legal authority to conduct closed meetings regarding proprietary business information.
Utility companies
These entities may continue to share proprietary business information with the commission in private settings without public disclosure.
Current stage: signed.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of information is kept private in these meetings?
Can the public ever see the records of these closed meetings?
Why It Matters
This legislation ensures that proprietary business information shared with the Florida Public Service Commission remains shielded from public disclosure indefinitely, rather than expiring on October 2, 2026.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
99
No
8
Present
0
Not Voting
10
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · not voting
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · no
Patt Maney
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Josie Tomkow
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
+ 93 more
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
32
No
3
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · excused
Ileana Garcia
Republican · excused
Jim Boyd
Republican · excused
Dave Smith
Republican · no
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
+ 15 more
Favorable
Total
22
Yes
19
No
3
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (22)
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · no
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · no
Jason Pizzo
Independent · no
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Favorable
Total
9
Yes
9
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Submitted and Reported Favorably as Committee
Total
7
Yes
7
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Removal of Sunset Provision
The legislature moved from a temporary, review-based exemption to a permanent exemption for the commission's closed-door meetings.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools