POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 2018 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Budget

Original title: ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing sets the stage for federal funding of nuclear safety oversight and determines the government's approach to managing nuclear waste, which impacts the operational viability of the nation's 99 commercial nuclear reactors.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nuclear power plant operators

These entities pay the fees that offset the majority of the NRC's annual budget.

Department of Energy

The agency is responsible for managing nuclear waste and pursuing the Yucca Mountain repository license.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development held a hearing to review the proposed $952 million fiscal year 2018 budget for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The discussion focused on the agency's role in overseeing nuclear power safety, the ongoing challenge of nuclear waste disposal, and the licensing of new reactor technologies.

Key Facts

  • The proposed fiscal year 2018 budget for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is $952 million.
  • The budget represents a $12 million increase over the fiscal year 2017 budget.
  • $814 million of the NRC budget is funded through fees paid by licensed utilities and facilities.
  • The budget includes $30 million to restart the review of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository license application.
  • The NRC oversees 99 commercial nuclear reactors in the United States.
  • Nuclear power currently provides 20 percent of the nation's electricity and over 60 percent of its carbon-free electricity.
  • The subcommittee plans to hold four budget hearings during the month of June 2017.
  • The hearing identified four priority areas: nuclear waste disposal, license extensions for existing reactors, licensing of advanced/modular reactors, and operational efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission funded?
The agency is primarily funded through fees paid by the utilities and facilities it regulates, which cover $814 million of its $952 million budget.
What is the status of the Yucca Mountain project?
The federal government is considering restarting the review of the license application for the Yucca Mountain repository, with $30 million proposed in the 2018 budget for this purpose.

Why It Matters

The hearing sets the stage for federal funding of nuclear safety oversight and determines the government's approach to managing nuclear waste, which impacts the operational viability of the nation's 99 commercial nuclear reactors.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Restarting Yucca Mountain Review

The 2018 budget proposal explicitly includes $30 million to restart the licensing review for the Yucca Mountain repository, signaling a potential shift in federal activity regarding the long-stalled project.

Connected Entities

personKristine SvinickiChairman of the Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMap →
organizationNuclear Regulatory CommissionIndependent federal agency responsible for nuclear safetyMap →
personLamar AlexanderChairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water DevelopmentMap →
personJeff BaranCommissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMap →
personStephen BurnsCommissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMap →
personDianne FeinsteinSenator and ranking member of the subcommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record