Congressional Hearing on Research Overhead Costs
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing explores how much federal research funding is spent on administrative compliance versus actual scientific discovery, which impacts the total amount of money available for research projects at universities nationwide.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Universities and Research Institutions
These institutions receive federal research grants and must comply with federal administrative and overhead cost regulations.
Federal Research Agencies
Agencies like the National Science Foundation manage the distribution of research funds and oversee compliance with overhead cost policies.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on May 24, 2017, by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
- The primary subject was the 'overhead cost' of research, referring to administrative expenses incurred by institutions receiving federal research grants.
- Witnesses included representatives from the National Science Foundation, the Government Accountability Office, Duke University, and Ohio University.
- The hearing included oral and written statements from committee members and invited experts.
- Post-hearing questions were submitted to and answered by Dale Bell (NSF) and James Luther (Duke University).
- The document is identified as Serial No. 115-15 of the 115th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 'overhead' in the context of scientific research?
Why was this hearing held?
Why It Matters
The hearing explores how much federal research funding is spent on administrative compliance versus actual scientific discovery, which impacts the total amount of money available for research projects at universities nationwide.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on Administrative Burden
The hearing highlights a recurring legislative interest in reducing the 'administrative burden' on researchers to maximize scientific output.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools