POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Veterans' Benefits Legislation (May 2015)

Original title: HEARING ON PENDING BENEFITS LEGISLATION

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing served as a formal venue for lawmakers and agency officials to review proposed changes to military and veteran benefit structures, which directly impact the compensation and services provided to service members and veterans.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Veterans

The legislation discussed concerns the structure and delivery of benefits, compensation, and retirement services for veterans.

Active Duty Military Personnel

Proposed changes to military compensation and retirement systems directly impact current service members.

Department of Veterans Affairs

The agency is responsible for implementing and managing the benefits programs under review.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official transcript record of a May 13, 2015, U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs hearing. The committee met to discuss pending legislation regarding military compensation, retirement modernization, and veterans' benefits.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 13, 2015, in room 418 of the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • The committee reviewed testimony from the Department of Defense, Department of Labor, and the Department of Veterans Affairs regarding pending benefits legislation.
  • The Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission provided testimony on proposed changes to military retirement and compensation systems.
  • Multiple veterans' advocacy groups, including the VFW and Reserve Officers Association, submitted formal statements for the record.
  • The hearing record includes responses to post-hearing questions submitted by Chairman Johnny Isakson to the Department of Defense.

Why It Matters

The hearing served as a formal venue for lawmakers and agency officials to review proposed changes to military and veteran benefit structures, which directly impact the compensation and services provided to service members and veterans.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The committee met to discuss and gather testimony on pending legislation related to veterans' benefits, military compensation, and retirement modernization.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the Department of Defense, the Department of Labor, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission, and representatives from various veterans' organizations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Modernization

The hearing highlights a specific legislative push in 2015 to modernize military compensation and retirement systems via the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission.

Connected Entities

personDavid R. McLenachenActing Deputy Under Secretary for Disability Assistance, VAMap →
personJohnny IsaksonChairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' AffairsMap →
personTeresa W. GertonDeputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Veterans Employment and Training ServiceMap →
personAlphonso Maldon, Jr.Chairman, Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization CommissionMap →
personAnthony KurtaDeputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Military Personnel PolicyMap →
personRichard BlumenthalRanking Member of the Senate Committee on Veterans' AffairsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record