Proposed Antisemitism Task Force (SB 1072)
January 5, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently dead. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
12 actions- Feb 24, 2026SenatePlaced on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- Feb 24, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
- Feb 19, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 02/24/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
- Feb 18, 2026SenateNow in Fiscal Policy
- Feb 18, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
- Feb 13, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 02/18/26, 10:30 am, 37 Senate Building
Show 6 earlier actions
- Feb 3, 2026SenateNow in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
- Feb 2, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
- Jan 28, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/02/26, 3:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
- Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced
- Jan 12, 2026SenateCommitteeReferred to Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Fiscal Policy
- Jan 5, 2026SenateIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill would have established a formal state-level body to evaluate hate crime laws and educational programs, impacting how the state addresses antisemitism and potentially influencing future legislation and law enforcement training.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Jewish community organizations
The bill required the appointment of representatives from these organizations to the task force.
Law enforcement agencies
The task force would have advised on training programs for law enforcement regarding hate crime investigations.
Public school districts
The task force would have assessed educational programs and gaps in digital media literacy within schools.
Last recorded activity January 5, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What would the Antisemitism Task Force have done?
Who would have served on the task force?
Did this bill become law?
Why It Matters
The bill would have established a formal state-level body to evaluate hate crime laws and educational programs, impacting how the state addresses antisemitism and potentially influencing future legislation and law enforcement training.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable
Total
22
Yes
20
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (22)
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · other
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · other
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Favorable
Total
10
Yes
10
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (10)
Favorable
Total
9
Yes
9
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Legislative Sunset
The bill included a mandatory sunset clause for 2029, ensuring the task force would require periodic legislative review to continue.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools