Senate Hearing on 2016 Election Security and Future Protections
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing establishes the federal government's ongoing role in providing cybersecurity support to state election systems, which directly impacts the security protocols and resources available to local jurisdictions for protecting voter data and ballot integrity.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State Election Officials
These officials are responsible for implementing election security measures and coordinating with DHS for federal support.
Department of Homeland Security
The agency is tasked with evolving its cybersecurity services to meet the needs of state election systems.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was convened to review the progress and findings of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
- The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has evolved its role to provide increased support to states for securing election infrastructure since 2016.
- Chairman Burr identified ongoing challenges including long wait times for DHS security services and difficulties in providing states with necessary information.
- The committee noted that attributing cyber attacks quickly and authoritatively remains a significant technical and intelligence challenge.
- Election administration remains primarily the responsibility of individual states, with the federal government acting in a support capacity.
- The hearing included testimony from two panels covering both federal agency perspectives and state-level election administration experts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is responsible for running elections in the United States?
What is the role of the Department of Homeland Security in election security?
Why It Matters
This hearing establishes the federal government's ongoing role in providing cybersecurity support to state election systems, which directly impacts the security protocols and resources available to local jurisdictions for protecting voter data and ballot integrity.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 2 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Evolution of DHS Role
The hearing highlights a clear transition in the DHS role from a reactive posture in 2016 to a more proactive support role for states by 2018.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools