Hearing on Prompt Global Strike Capabilities
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing informs congressional oversight of military technology development, specifically conventional prompt global strike systems designed to strike targets anywhere in the world rapidly without using nuclear weapons.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Defense
The department is responsible for the research, development, and potential deployment of prompt global strike systems.
Congressional Subcommittee on Strategic Forces
The subcommittee exercises oversight and budgetary authority over the strategic programs discussed.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on December 8, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The subcommittee formally received testimony regarding conventional prompt global strike (CPGS) developments.
- Opening statements from the Chairman and Ranking Member were submitted for the record rather than read aloud due to a series of procedural votes.
- Witnesses included Gen. C. Robert Kehler (USAF Ret.), Thomas Scheber, and Dr. James Acton.
- The subcommittee maintains oversight of the U.S. strategic deterrent, including nuclear triad modernization and conventional capabilities.
- The hearing addressed the intersection of violent extremism and weapons of mass destruction as a national security concern.
Why It Matters
This hearing informs congressional oversight of military technology development, specifically conventional prompt global strike systems designed to strike targets anywhere in the world rapidly without using nuclear weapons.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Prompt Global Strike?
Why was the hearing held?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Procedural Constraints
The hearing was significantly impacted by a series of floor votes, forcing the committee to bypass opening statements to ensure witness testimony could be heard.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools