Update on Guantanamo Bay Detainee Transfers
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing establishes the oversight framework for the executive branch's process of transferring detainees to foreign countries, which impacts national security policy and the operational status of the Guantanamo Bay facility.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Department of Defense
The agency is responsible for the management and closure process of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.
Retired U.S. military officers
A group of 42 officers submitted a letter to the committee advocating for the closure of the facility.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on February 12, 2015, by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
- The primary subject was the interagency process for transferring detainees from Guantanamo Bay to other countries.
- Witnesses included Paul M. Lewis (DOD) and Charles Trumbull (State Department).
- The hearing included a public session followed by a classified session involving the Defense Intelligence Agency.
- A letter signed by 42 retired U.S. military officers advocating for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay facility was submitted for the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing establishes the oversight framework for the executive branch's process of transferring detainees to foreign countries, which impacts national security policy and the operational status of the Guantanamo Bay facility.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Military Support for Closure
The record includes a formal submission from 42 retired military officers explicitly advocating for the closure of the Guantanamo facility.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools