POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Motion Picture Association of America (Q2 2000)

Original title: NEFF/THOMAS INC. lobbying for MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report identifies the financial investment and specific legislative priorities of the film industry's primary trade association during the 2000 legislative session.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Motion Picture Association of America

The organization incurred costs to influence state legislative outcomes.

Neff/Thomas Inc.

The firm received payment for providing lobbying services to the MPAA.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses payments made by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to the firm Neff/Thomas Inc. for services rendered between April 1 and June 30, 2000. It lists the specific state legislative bills that were the focus of the lobbying efforts during this period.

Key Facts

  • The Motion Picture Association of America paid Neff/Thomas Inc. $36,912 for lobbying services.
  • The reporting period for these payments was April 1, 2000, through June 30, 2000.
  • Lobbying activity focused on 18 Assembly Bills (AB): 1712, 2222, 1856, 1714, 1998, 1717, 1934, 1490, 484, 2866, 2184, 651, 2543, 273, 1961, 2053, 2351, and 1468.
  • Lobbying activity focused on 17 Senate Bills (SB): 546, 31, 1317, 1462, 996, 1319, 1384, 1385, 1412, 2184, 129, 1327, 1490, 1822, and 1741.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much did the MPAA spend on lobbying during this period?
The MPAA paid $36,912 to Neff/Thomas Inc. for the period of April 1, 2000, to June 30, 2000.
Which bills were the focus of this lobbying effort?
The firm tracked 35 specific pieces of legislation, including 18 Assembly Bills and 17 Senate Bills listed in the report.

Why It Matters

This report identifies the financial investment and specific legislative priorities of the film industry's primary trade association during the 2000 legislative session.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

NEFF/THOMAS INC.

on behalf of MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

Senate LDAView filing →

NEFF/THOMAS INC.

on behalf of MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MPAA) & ITS AFFILIATED ENTITY MOTION PICTURE ASSOC. OF AMERICA-CALIFORNIA GROUP

Senate LDAView filing →

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

High Volume Legislative Tracking

The lobbyist was tracking 35 distinct bills in a single quarter, suggesting a broad interest in the legislative agenda rather than a single-issue focus.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record