POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Astrobiology

Original title: ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS, AND ASTROBIOLOGY

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing provides the official record of federal oversight regarding the strategic priorities and funding direction for U.S. space science research programs conducted by NASA and the NSF.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

NASA

The agency's research priorities and budget allocations are subject to the oversight and guidance discussed in this hearing.

National Science Foundation

The agency's funding and support for astronomical research are reviewed by the committee.

Academic and Research Institutions

Researchers and universities receiving federal grants for space science are impacted by the policy priorities established by the committee.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2016 joint congressional hearing held by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The hearing focused on the current state and future goals of research in astronomy, , and the search for life in the universe, featuring testimony from NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF), and academic experts.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on July 12, 2016, by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  • The session was a joint hearing between the Subcommittee on Space and the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
  • The hearing covered the status of federal research programs in astronomy, astrophysics, and astrobiology.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee.
  • The record includes written statements from committee members and witnesses, as well as responses to post-hearing questions.
  • The hearing is documented as Serial No. 114-87 of the 114th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review the current status and future objectives of U.S. government-funded research in astronomy, , and .
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from NASA and the National Science Foundation, as well as academic experts from the University of Chicago, UC San Diego, and the American Astronomical Society.

Why It Matters

The hearing provides the official record of federal oversight regarding the strategic priorities and funding direction for U.S. space science research programs conducted by NASA and the NSF.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Inter-agency Collaboration

The hearing structure highlights the coordination between NASA and the NSF in managing the nation's astronomical research portfolio.

Connected Entities

personChristine JonesPresident of the American Astronomical SocietyMap →
organizationNASANational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMap →
personAngela OlintoChair of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommitteeMap →
personJim UlvestadDirector of the Division of Astronomical Sciences at NSFMap →
organizationNational Science FoundationFederal agency supporting fundamental researchMap →
personBarbara ComstockChairwoman of the Subcommittee on Research and TechnologyMap →
personPaul HertzDirector of the Astrophysics Division at NASAMap →
personShelly WrightProfessor at UC San Diego and Breakthrough Listen Advisory Committee memberMap →
personBrian BabinChairman of the Subcommittee on SpaceMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record