Congressional Hearing on Digital Currency and Blockchain Technology
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing established the early federal legislative framework for how digital assets and systems are understood and regulated in the United States.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Digital currency and blockchain companies
These entities provided testimony regarding the regulatory environment and technological potential of their industry.
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
The committee members gathered information to inform future legislative and oversight activities regarding financial technology.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on March 16, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The hearing was held by the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- The session was part of the 'Disrupter Series' focused on emerging technologies.
- Seven industry experts and legal professionals provided testimony regarding digital currency and blockchain.
- A letter from Ryan Zagone of Ripple regarding regulatory relations was submitted into the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing established the early federal legislative framework for how digital assets and systems are understood and regulated in the United States.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 3 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Early Congressional Interest
The hearing demonstrates that Congress was actively investigating blockchain technology as early as 2016 under the 'Disrupter Series' framework.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools