Oversight Hearing: U.S. Department of Justice (February 2019)
January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing served as a formal mechanism for the legislative branch to exercise over the executive branch's Department of Justice, impacting public transparency regarding federal law enforcement priorities and administrative actions.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Justice
The department's leadership was required to provide testimony and respond to inquiries from the House Judiciary Committee.
House Judiciary Committee Members
Members participated in the oversight process by questioning the Acting Attorney General and submitting materials for the record.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 8, 2019, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The primary witness was Matthew G. Whitaker, then-Acting Attorney General of the United States.
- The hearing was conducted by the 116th Congress House Committee on the Judiciary.
- The committee entered various documents into the record, including letters, articles, and legal case documents.
- The hearing included opening statements from Chairman Jerrold Nadler and Ranking Member Doug Collins.
- The committee formally acknowledged the passing of former Representative John Dingell.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who was the primary witness?
Why It Matters
The hearing served as a formal mechanism for the legislative branch to exercise over the executive branch's Department of Justice, impacting public transparency regarding federal law enforcement priorities and administrative actions.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Diverse Record Submissions
The hearing record includes a wide range of supplemental materials, from the U.S. Constitution to specific district court cases and articles on border policy, indicating the broad scope of topics committee members sought to address.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools