POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Subcommittee Hearing on 2017 Defense IT and Cyber Programs

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 114-117] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing sets the oversight framework for how the Department of Defense allocates funding for cyber defense and IT infrastructure in the 2017 fiscal year, impacting the security and modernization of military networks.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency must align its IT and cyber budget requests with the oversight requirements and management standards discussed by the subcommittee.

Defense IT Contractors

The emphasis on public-private partnerships and the adoption of commercial tools may influence future procurement opportunities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities held a hearing to review the Department of Defense's fiscal year 2017 budget request for information technology and cyber programs. The discussion focused on balancing technological innovation with management discipline, the use of commercial business tools, and the development of for cyber operations.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 22, 2016, to review the fiscal year 2017 budget request for IT and cyber programs.
  • The subcommittee emphasized the need for increased innovation through public-private partnerships.
  • The Chairman highlighted the necessity of using commercial business analytics and cloud computing tools within the Department of Defense.
  • The hearing addressed the challenge of maintaining human capital for the acquisition and management of IT and cyber systems.
  • The Department of Defense is tasked with balancing increased innovation with management discipline to maximize the use of defense dollars.
  • Witnesses included the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer and the Deputy Chief Management Officer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
To review the Department of Defense's budget request for IT and cyber programs for the 2017 fiscal year and discuss strategies for secure warfighting networks.
Who testified at the hearing?
The Honorable Terry Halvorsen, Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Honorable Peter Levine, Deputy of the Department of Defense.

Why It Matters

This hearing sets the oversight framework for how the Department of Defense allocates funding for cyber defense and IT infrastructure in the 2017 fiscal year, impacting the security and modernization of military networks.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Emphasis on Commercial Integration

The hearing highlights a clear policy shift toward integrating commercial business intelligence and cloud computing tools into military IT infrastructure.

Connected Entities

organizationDepartment of DefenseThe federal department subject to the oversight hearingMap →
personAshton CarterSecretary of DefenseMap →
personJames R. LangevinRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →
personJoe WilsonChairman of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and CapabilitiesMap →
personPeter LevineDeputy Chief Management Officer, Department of DefenseMap →
personTerry HalvorsenChief Information Officer, Department of DefenseMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record