POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Port Security and Cybersecurity

Original title: EXAMINING PHYSICAL SECURITY AND CYBERSECURITY AT OUR NATION'S PORTS

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to assess the vulnerability of U.S. maritime infrastructure to physical threats and cyberattacks, which directly impacts national supply chain stability and trade security.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Coast Guard

Responsible for maritime safety and security enforcement at the ports.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Manages border security and cargo inspection operations at the ports.

International Longshore and Warehouse Union

Represents the workforce that operates the port facilities and handles cargo.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Homeland Security held a at the Port of Los Angeles to evaluate the physical and digital security measures protecting major U.S. ports. The session included testimony from Coast Guard officials, Customs and Border Protection, port directors, and labor union representatives.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 30, 2017, at the Port of Los Angeles Administration Building in San Pedro, California.
  • The session was an official field hearing of the House Committee on Homeland Security, Serial No. 115-35.
  • The committee conducted a tour of both the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach prior to the hearing.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, port executive leadership, and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union.
  • The hearing focused on both physical security protocols and cybersecurity vulnerabilities at U.S. ports.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to assess the vulnerability of U.S. maritime infrastructure to physical threats and cyberattacks, which directly impacts national supply chain stability and trade security.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of a 'field hearing'?
A is a formal Congressional meeting held outside of Washington, D.C., to allow committee members to observe local operations firsthand and gather testimony from regional stakeholders.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included Rear Admiral Todd A. Sokalzuk (Coast Guard), Carlos C. Martel (CBP), Eugene D. Seroka (Port of Los Angeles), Mario Cordero (Port of Long Beach), and Ray Familathe (International Longshore and Warehouse Union).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Inter-agency Coordination

The hearing highlights a collaborative oversight approach involving both the Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection alongside local port authorities.

Connected Entities

personBennie G. ThompsonRanking Member of the Committee on Homeland SecurityMap →
personCarlos C. MartelDirector of Field Operations, Los Angeles Field Office, U.S. Customs and Border Map →
personRay FamilatheInternational Vice President, International Longshore and Warehouse UnionMap →
personEugene D. SerokaExecutive Director, The Port of Los AngelesMap →
personMario CorderoExecutive Director, The Port of Long BeachMap →
locationPort of Long BeachSubject of security reviewMap →
personTodd A. SokalzukRear Admiral, Commander of the Eleventh Coast Guard DistrictMap →
personMichael T. McCaulChairman of the House Committee on Homeland SecurityMap →
locationPort of Los AngelesHost location for the field hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record